Re: [openssl-users] Re: Bad OIDs

2013-11-29 Thread Erwann Abalea
Le 28/11/2013 22:18, Rob Stradling a écrit : On 28/11/13 15:14, Erwann Abalea wrote: How nice, they're asking for a self-signed certificate to include a specific EKU to indicate it's a Trust Anchor, and the OID used for this has never been allocated. Crazy. It's crazier than that. RFC5906

Re: [openssl-users] Re: Bad OIDs

2013-11-29 Thread Erwann Abalea
Le 29/11/2013 16:25, Dr. Stephen Henson a écrit : On Thu, Nov 28, 2013, Erwann Abalea wrote: How nice, they're asking for a self-signed certificate to include a specific EKU to indicate it's a Trust Anchor, and the OID used for this has never been allocated. Crazy. I just looked at OpenSSL's

Re: [openssl-users] Re: Bad OIDs

2013-11-29 Thread Erwann Abalea
Le 29/11/2013 17:53, Erwann Abalea a écrit : Le 29/11/2013 16:25, Dr. Stephen Henson a écrit : Changing OIDs in the table is problematical. If anything uses them it could break them in all sorts of ways. The NID_* entries would change and text based lookup would no longer work. The reference

Re: [openssl-users] Re: Bad OIDs

2013-11-29 Thread Dr. Stephen Henson
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013, Erwann Abalea wrote: Le 29/11/2013 17:53, Erwann Abalea a écrit : Le 29/11/2013 16:25, Dr. Stephen Henson a écrit : Changing OIDs in the table is problematical. If anything uses them it could break them in all sorts of ways. The NID_* entries would change and text