On 10/13/2010 3:31 PM, Bill Durant wrote:
I am interested in building the static version of the FIPS-capable OpenSSL as
an universal
binary.
Three builds, per spec, of the FIPS canister. No tweaks, no exceptions to
the security policy.
Then it's possible but non-trivial to integrate these
On 10/13/2010 7:22 PM, Bill Durant wrote:
On Oct 13, 2010, at 5:19 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 10/13/2010 3:31 PM, Bill Durant wrote:
I am interested in building the static version of the FIPS-capable OpenSSL
as an universal
binary.
Three builds, per spec, of the FIPS canister.
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Bill Durant cipherte...@gmail.com wrote:
That may not be sufficient, can ldfips be modified(?), it's certainly
needed to link
static to the fips canister. I'd put your energies into building a dylib
which would
give you a smidge more flexibility.
fipsld can
On Oct 13, 2010, at 5:19 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 10/13/2010 3:31 PM, Bill Durant wrote:
I am interested in building the static version of the FIPS-capable
OpenSSL as an universal
binary.
Three builds, per spec, of the FIPS canister. No tweaks, no
exceptions to
the security
On Oct 13, 2010, at 5:27 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 10/13/2010 7:22 PM, Bill Durant wrote:
On Oct 13, 2010, at 5:19 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 10/13/2010 3:31 PM, Bill Durant wrote:
I am interested in building the static version of the FIPS-
capable OpenSSL as an universal
