On Thu, 23 Aug 2001 10:03:10 -0500 (EST), "Mark H. Wood"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Caliban Tiresias Darklock wrote:
>> Just out of curiosity, why are attachments allowed on the list in the
>> first place? Is there any legitimate reason for it?
>
>Well, why not? Is there an
On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Caliban Tiresias Darklock wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, why are attachments allowed on the list in the
> first place? Is there any legitimate reason for it?
Well, why not? Is there any legitimate reason *not* to?
--
Mark H. Wood, Lead System Programmer [EMAIL PROTECTED
>-Original Message-
>From: Steven Reddie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: 22 August 2001 12:23
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Wasn't someone joking about the virus being posted by an
>autoresponder
>
>
>At least I thought it was a joke.
>
>
On Wed, 22 Aug 2001 08:05:24 -0600, Nathan Bell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I still think this would all stop if the openssl mail server rejected (and
>deleted) the virus before sending the message to everyone on the list.
Just out of curiosity, why are attachments allowed on the list in the
fir
I still think this would all stop if the openssl mail server rejected (and
deleted) the virus before sending the message to everyone on the list.
Thomas Bätzler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Steven Reddie [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > Subject: Wasn't someone joking about
Hi,
> Steven Reddie [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Subject: Wasn't someone joking about the virus being posted by an
> autoresponder
>
> At least I thought it was a joke.
>
No Joke. The virus scanner run by btitele.com bounces the virus
back on the list ag
At least I thought it was a joke.
Steven
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [
