onvention..?
>
> 2) Are the steps which I followed to build the FIPS capable openssl steps
> right..?
>
>
> Thanks,
> JA
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/f
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008, Justin A wrote:
> Steve:
>
> Thanks for your response.!
>
> 1) Will there be an issue if we change the names from ssleay32.lib ->
> ssl.lib and libeayfips32.lib -> crypto.lib . I remember reading on some
> forms that changing the names of the library which are generated by
10/16/08, Dr. Stephen Henson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Dr. Stephen Henson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: fips 1.2 build on windows VC 9
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Date: Thursday, October 16, 2008, 1:38 PM
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008, Justin A wrote:
>
> My Question is:-
&
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008, Justin A wrote:
>
> My Question is:-
>
> 1) I remember when I previously build openssl I used to end up getting
> libcrypto.lib and libssl.a. Now its ssleay32.lib and libeayfips32.lib
> instead of libssl.a and libcrypto.a respectively. I ran the dumpbin on these
> two libra
Hi,
Have some doubts on fips build on windows VC9. I followed the userguide for
1.2.
1) Downloaded the openssl-fips-test-1.2.0.tar.gz
* perl Configure no-asm VC-WIN32
* ms\do_fips
2) Downloaded the openssl-0.9.8-fips-test-SNAP-YYMMDD.tar.gz
*perl Configure VC-WIN32 no-asm fi
