Re: shared libraries vs test cases

2019-02-27 Thread Michael Richardson
Richard Levitte wrote: >> Running LDD on the binaries in test/* shows that they appear to link against >> the "system" copies of libssl and libcrypto. >> >> Perhaps something I'm missing is setting up LD_PRELOAD or some such so that >> the tests run the local copy of

Re: shared libraries vs test cases

2019-02-27 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
> On Feb 27, 2019, at 11:04 AM, Michael Richardson wrote: > > Running LDD on the binaries in test/* shows that they appear to link against > the "system" copies of libssl and libcrypto. With no environment overrides of LD_LIBRARY_PATH or similar, the test cases in the build tree are expected to

Re: shared libraries vs test cases

2019-02-27 Thread Jakob Bohm via openssl-users
On 27/02/2019 17:04, Michael Richardson wrote: Running LDD on the binaries in test/* shows that they appear to link against the "system" copies of libssl and libcrypto. Perhaps something I'm missing is setting up LD_PRELOAD or some such so that the tests run the local copy of libssl/libcrypto,

Re: shared libraries vs test cases

2019-02-27 Thread Richard Levitte
On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 17:04:09 +0100, Michael Richardson wrote: > > Running LDD on the binaries in test/* shows that they appear to link against > the "system" copies of libssl and libcrypto. > > Perhaps something I'm missing is setting up LD_PRELOAD or some such so that > the tests run the local

shared libraries vs test cases

2019-02-27 Thread Michael Richardson
Running LDD on the binaries in test/* shows that they appear to link against the "system" copies of libssl and libcrypto. Perhaps something I'm missing is setting up LD_PRELOAD or some such so that the tests run the local copy of libssl/libcrypto, but I can't find that. Am I missing something?