Re: speed test with cavium engine

2007-01-12 Thread Elwin Stelzer Eliazer
Thank you for all the useful input, and sorry about my delay in response. The problem i noticed was some of the cavium related IOCTLs are failing in my setup, and it seemlessly falls back to the default algorithms. By default, only RSA is offloaded, and you are right DSA is not offloaded to

Re: speed test with cavium engine

2007-01-10 Thread Marek Marcola
Hello, I am trying to compare the performance benefits in using hardware accelerator, and am experimenting the CAVIUM SSL card. I am comparing the results between 'speed' and 'speed -engine cavium', and i do not see any difference in numbers. I do see the message 'cavium engine set', but

Re: speed test with cavium engine

2007-01-08 Thread jimmy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Hi, I am trying to compare the performance benefits in using hardware accelerator, and am experimenting the CAVIUM SSL card. I am comparing the results between 'speed' and 'speed -engine cavium', and i do not see any difference in numbers. I do see the message

Re: speed test with cavium engine

2007-01-07 Thread Mathias Brossard
Elwin Stelzer Eliazer wrote: After your email below, i tried -multi and also time. I also loaded the CPU and took some measurements. But to my surprise, i am getting the same performance numbers, for time ./openssl speed dsa, in all the three following cases. Are you sure the engine offloads

Re: speed test with cavium engine

2007-01-05 Thread A . L . M . Buxey
Hi, Hi, I am trying to compare the performance benefits in using hardware accelerator, and am experimenting the CAVIUM SSL card. I am comparing the results between 'speed' and 'speed -engine cavium', and i do not see any difference in numbers. I do see the message 'cavium engine set',

Re: speed test with cavium engine

2007-01-05 Thread Mathias Brossard
Elwin Stelzer Eliazer wrote: I am trying to compare the performance benefits in using hardware accelerator, and am experimenting the CAVIUM SSL card. I am comparing the results between 'speed' and 'speed -engine cavium', and i do not see any difference in numbers. I do see the message

Re: speed test with cavium engine

2007-01-05 Thread Rick Jones
you may find that the cavium platform is as fast as your CPU - or that the PCI bandwidth is being exhausted etc - however, what you REALLY should be doing is checking your processor load when testing. after all, doing 250m 1024bit keys/s with 1% CPU laod is far far better for a server than 255m

Re: speed test with cavium engine

2007-01-05 Thread Elwin Stelzer Eliazer
Thank you all for your comments, but i still do not have the issue resolved. After your email below, i tried -multi and also time. I also loaded the CPU and took some measurements. But to my surprise, i am getting the same performance numbers, for time ./openssl speed dsa, in all the three

speed test with cavium engine

2007-01-04 Thread Elwin Stelzer Eliazer
Hi, I am trying to compare the performance benefits in using hardware accelerator, and am experimenting the CAVIUM SSL card. I am comparing the results between 'speed' and 'speed -engine cavium', and i do not see any difference in numbers. I do see the message 'cavium engine set', but really do