Hi to the ML
when I want to compile openssl-0.9.6b
I have the following answer:
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/julien/source/openssl-0.9.6b/doc'
pod2man --center='OpenSSL Documentation' --release=OpenSSL
--section=1
openssl.pod openssl.1
Can't open openssl.pod for reading: No such file
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 09:05:52AM +, Laurent Jouannic wrote:
Hi to the ML
when I want to compile openssl-0.9.6b
I have the following answer:
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/julien/source/openssl-0.9.6b/doc'
pod2man --center='OpenSSL Documentation' --release=OpenSSL
--section=1
Hi Lutz,
First, thanks 4 your answer.
Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 09:05:52AM +, Laurent Jouannic wrote:
Hi to the ML
when I want to compile openssl-0.9.6b
I have the following answer:
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/julien/source/openssl-0.9.6b/doc'
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 11:30:17AM +, Laurent Jouannic wrote:
Well, I had allready downloaded a version of opennsll-0.9.6b and it ran
great.
That's fine, as far as I am concerned :-).
But I run under Debian and to build a apache-ssl with transparent proxy, I
have to get the source of
Sorry,I asked to early, There is
nothing wrong with the code. The file is not a public key file (or the format
isd wrong) How do I extract a public key file from a
certificate?
Hylton
-Original Message-From: Hylton Tregenza
Sent: 16 November 2001 12:24To:
[EMAIL
Hylton Tregenza wrote:
Sorry, I asked to early, There is nothing wrong with the code. The file
is not a public key file (or the format isd wrong) How do I extract a
public key file from a certificate?
by command line:
$ openssl x509 -in cert.pem -pubkey -noout
by writing some code:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 02:35:36PM -0500, Louis LeBlanc wrote:
Hey Lutz. Thanks for your confirmation to my last message. Sorry to
bother everyone again, but I'm still not seeing what I expect with
this one call to see how many renegotiations I am getting.
On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at
I'm not able to install openssl-0.9.6b on my linuxsystem.
Here is a short errordescription on it:
znn9156:~/openssl-0.9.6b # make
+ rm -f libcrypto.so.0
+ rm -f libcrypto.so
+ rm -f libcrypto.so.0.9.6
+ rm -f libssl.so.0
+ rm -f libssl.so
+ rm -f libssl.so.0.9.6
making all in crypto...
make[1]:
Hi,
Is it legal to use some parts of OpenSSL
(such as RSA routines) not whole lib?
Thanks for any replies
-Ray Yang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Heinz,
Look for errno.h on your system. If it is there then either make sure
that the #INCLUDEerrno.h is pointing to the right place and also make
sure that the INCLUDE path is include in the CFLAGS of the Makefile.
HTH,
Harry
On Fri, 16 Nov 2001, Heinz Allerberger wrote:
I'm not able
Matthew Fleming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But what I have written is, not a standalone server program, but a
daemon which is invoked by inetd. It seems to me that this should
work
the same as the standalone, except that the tcp_listen() and accept()
calls should be unnecessary; inetd should
I am the planning phase of PKI which must support Adobe Acrobat Digital
Signatures. Adobe offers an SDK that enables development of a hierachical
signing structure. I have downloaded and installed Verisign's
implimentation of it. I am looking for a pre-built opensource version of
the plug in.
Hi people.
Got some troubles compiling openssl-0.9.6b under AIX OS version 4.2
all work fine untill I run make install, the compiler replay with
Target all is up to date.
installing man1/CA.pl.1
Can't locate Getopt/Long.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
/extra/Programas/perl/lib/aix/5.00404
Hi people.
Got some troubles compiling openssl-0.9.6b under AIX OS version 4.2
all work fine untill I run make install, the compiler replay with
Target all is up to date.
installing man1/CA.pl.1
Can't locate Getopt/Long.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
/extra/Programas/perl/lib/aix/5.00404
Netmeisters,
I am trying to use SSL to secure communications between a Pocket PC and
a Linux server. The former uses the SSL intrinsic to Windows CE, the
latter uses OpenSSL. I've posted about some problems I have had with
inetd, but it now appears that this problem may be secondary. If I make
On Fri, 16 Nov 2001, Takaaki Ishii wrote:
Hylton Tregenza wrote:
Sorry, I asked to early, There is nothing wrong with the code. The file
is not a public key file (or the format isd wrong) How do I extract a
public key file from a certificate?
How about to use X509_get_pubkey
I hate to distract from the original issue, but what is ethereal? Some
kind of dump or sniffer? Where can it be found?
Rod Gilchrist
1. There is a specific reason that I am using rev a instead of rev b, and I
didn't think it relevant to the problem. For the heck of it, I d/l and
compiled rev b, with the exact same result.
2. I always do. That way I can archive it with the tarball for later
inspection in case I need information
Title: ÉϹØϵͨ£¬½±ÉÌÎñͨ£¡
ÉϹØϵͨ£¬½±ÉÌÎñͨ
Hi,
Is there any documentation about the program flow of a SSL webclient?
Thanks in advance,
Julio
Visite http://www.bancorio.com.ar y tenga el Banco al alcance de su mano.
VORTEX SUPPLIES
YOUR LASER PRINTER TONER CARTRIDGE,
COPIER AND FAX CARTRIDGE CONNECTION
SAVE UP TO 30% FROM RETAIL
ORDER BY PHONE:1-888-288-9043
ORDER BY FAX: 1-888-977-1577
E-MAIL REMOVAL LINE: 1-888-248-4930
UNIVERSITY AND/OR SCHOOL PURCHASE ORDERS WELCOME. (NO CREDIT APPROVAL
Glover Barker wrote:
I hate to distract from the original issue, but what is ethereal? Some
kind of dump or sniffer? Where can it be found?
It comes up at the top of the google hit list on the name.
www.ethereal.com.
Yes, its great. 10 minute install, hit capture-start and
select an
Hello,
I have just installed stunnel (stunnel-3.21c.exe) on my windows 2000
machine, and everything seems to be working well. The only problem I've run
into is generating a new .pem file. Since I am using the libssl32 and
libeay32 DLLs, I am unable to run commands like openssl req -new -x509
From: Keary Suska [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hierophant 1. There is a specific reason that I am using rev a
hierophant instead of rev b, and I didn't think it relevant to the
hierophant problem. For the heck of it, I d/l and compiled rev b,
hierophant with the exact same result.
You're right, that
24 matches
Mail list logo
