On 08/27/2018 04:07 PM, Hubert Kario wrote:
On Monday, 27 August 2018 20:57:53 CEST Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 08/27/2018 02:33 PM, Hubert Kario wrote:
On Thursday, 23 August 2018 16:35:01 CEST Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 08/23/2018 09:00 AM, Tomas Mraz wrote:
On Wed, 2018-08-22 at 20:08
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 04:38:24PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>
> On 08/27/2018 04:07 PM, Hubert Kario wrote:
> >On Monday, 27 August 2018 20:57:53 CEST Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> >>On 08/27/2018 02:33 PM, Hubert Kario wrote:
> >>>On Thursday, 23 August 2018 16:35:01 CEST Robert Moskowitz
On 08/27/2018 04:55 PM, Benjamin Kaduk via openssl-users wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 04:38:24PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 08/27/2018 04:07 PM, Hubert Kario wrote:
On Monday, 27 August 2018 20:57:53 CEST Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 08/27/2018 02:33 PM, Hubert Kario wrote:
On
Changing Subject to help googlability :)
On Monday, 27 August 2018 22:38:24 CEST Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> On 08/27/2018 04:07 PM, Hubert Kario wrote:
> > now, for generating testing certificates (and what's more important, the
> > whole PKI) we are using this script to provide sensible defaults
Since this example would show how to generate certificates that people may not
have a lot of experience dealing with - I think it would make a lot of sense to
document as much as possible.
In short: yes please do include the examples of both what the certs should look
like, and how to generate
On Saturday, 18 August 2018 19:48:21 CEST Juan Isoza wrote:
> What is the difference between draft 28 and rfc for tls 1.3 ?
the downgrade protection mechanism gets enabled for the first time
--
Regards,
Hubert Kario
Senior Quality Engineer, QE BaseOS Security team
Web: www.cz.redhat.com
Red Hat
On Thursday, 23 August 2018 16:35:01 CEST Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> On 08/23/2018 09:00 AM, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> > On Wed, 2018-08-22 at 20:08 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> >> On 08/22/2018 11:48 AM, Matt Caswell wrote:
> >>> On 22/08/18 00:53, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> On 08/21/2018 06:31
On Monday, 27 August 2018 20:57:53 CEST Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> On 08/27/2018 02:33 PM, Hubert Kario wrote:
> > On Thursday, 23 August 2018 16:35:01 CEST Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> >> On 08/23/2018 09:00 AM, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 2018-08-22 at 20:08 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
On 08/27/2018 02:33 PM, Hubert Kario wrote:
On Thursday, 23 August 2018 16:35:01 CEST Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 08/23/2018 09:00 AM, Tomas Mraz wrote:
On Wed, 2018-08-22 at 20:08 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 08/22/2018 11:48 AM, Matt Caswell wrote:
On 22/08/18 00:53, Robert Moskowitz
Openssl 1.1.1 pre 9 is now compatible with final RFC tls 1.3
but I see several recent commit , so I suppose we'll see a pre 10 before
final openssl 1.1.1
Any idea for the possible date of publication of 1.1.1 final (if there is
no major bug/problem) ?
regards
juan
--
openssl-users mailing
On 27/08/18 13:50, Juan Isoza wrote:
> Openssl 1.1.1 pre 9 is now compatible with final RFC tls 1.3
>
> but I see several recent commit , so I suppose we'll see a pre 10 before
> final openssl 1.1.1
>
>
> Any idea for the possible date of publication of 1.1.1 final (if there
> is no major
11 matches
Mail list logo