Re: Congratulations! Missing 3.0.0 tag?

2021-09-08 Thread William Roberts
It's there: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/releases/tag/openssl-3.0.0 I checked it out this morning. On Wed, Sep 8, 2021, 16:32 Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: > Yeah? > :) > > --steffen > | > |Der Kragenbaer,The moon bear, > |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by

Re: Congratulations! Missing 3.0.0 tag?

2021-09-08 Thread William Roberts
On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 5:15 PM Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: > > Hello. > > William Roberts wrote in > : > |It's there: > |https://github.com/openssl/openssl/releases/tag/openssl-3.0.0 > | > |I checked it out this morning. > > Oh! I have > > fetch =

Re: Congratulations! Missing 3.0.0 tag?

2021-09-08 Thread Benjamin Kaduk via openssl-users
On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 12:15:44AM +0200, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: > > P.S.: maybe at least release commits and tags could be signed? > And/or HTTPS access to the repository ... but then i get the gut > feeling that the answer to this will be "use github" or something. tag openssl-3.0.0 Tagger:

Congratulations! Missing 3.0.0 tag?

2021-09-08 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso
Yeah? :) --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer,The moon bear, |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off |(By Robert Gernhardt)

Re: Congratulations! Missing 3.0.0 tag?

2021-09-08 Thread Dr Paul Dale
With the change to (almost) semantic versioning, we also decided to make the tags easier to type. Pauli On 9/9/21 9:03 am, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: Benjamin Kaduk wrote in <2021090848.gx19...@akamai.com>: |On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 12:15:44AM +0200, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: |> |>

Re: Congratulations! Missing 3.0.0 tag?

2021-09-08 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso
Hello. William Roberts wrote in : |It's there: |https://github.com/openssl/openssl/releases/tag/openssl-3.0.0 | |I checked it out this morning. Oh! I have fetch = +refs/heads/master:refs/remotes/origin/master fetch =

Re: Congratulations! Missing 3.0.0 tag?

2021-09-08 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso
Benjamin Kaduk wrote in <2021090848.gx19...@akamai.com>: |On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 12:15:44AM +0200, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: |> |> P.S.: maybe at least release commits and tags could be signed? |> And/or HTTPS access to the repository ... but then i get the gut |> feeling that the answer

Re: Congratulations! Missing 3.0.0 tag?

2021-09-08 Thread Benjamin Kaduk via openssl-users
On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 01:03:28AM +0200, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: > But if i use > > #?0|kent:tls-openssl.git$ alias gl1 > alias gl1='git slpn -1' > #?0|kent:tls-openssl.git$ git alias|grep slpn > alias.slpn log --show-signature --patch --find-renames --stat > --no-abbrev-commit >

Re: ENGINE API replacement for Openssl3.0

2021-09-08 Thread Tomas Mraz
Hello, there is no direct replacement. The ENGINEs as a pluggable crypto modules concept is replaced with the providers concept which is much more sophisticated and capable. Please look at https://www.openssl.org/docs/man3.0/man7/migration_guide.html ENGINEs support is not removed from OpenSSL

ENGINE API replacement for Openssl3.0

2021-09-08 Thread Shivakumar Poojari
Hi Upgrading our code to openssl 3.0. the below function we trying to replace ENGINE_load_dynamic() Replacment for 3.0 what i found OPENSSL_init_crypto(OPENSSL_INIT_ENGINE_DYNAMIC, NULL) ENGINE_by_id("dynamic") ENGINE_ctrl_cmd_string() ENGINE_set_default() ENGINE_get_DH() ENGINE_free()