RE: Congratulations! Missing 3.0.0 tag?

2021-09-09 Thread Randall S. Becker
When git cloning, please remember that you might have to perform a git fetch --tags to pick up all tags from the upstream repository. After that, perform a git checkout openssl-3.0.0, which will give you a disconnected HEAD, but will refer to the correct release. You can always make your own

RE: Congratulations! Missing 3.0.0 tag?

2021-09-09 Thread Randall S. Becker
On September 9, 2021 6:56 AM, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: >Benjamin Kaduk wrote in > <20210908233639.gy19...@akamai.com>: > |On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 01:03:28AM +0200, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: > |> But if i use > |> > |> #?0|kent:tls-openssl.git$ alias gl1 > |> alias gl1='git slpn -1' > |>

Re: Congratulations! Missing 3.0.0 tag?

2021-09-09 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso
Benjamin Kaduk wrote in <20210908233639.gy19...@akamai.com>: |On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 01:03:28AM +0200, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: |> But if i use |> |> #?0|kent:tls-openssl.git$ alias gl1 |> alias gl1='git slpn -1' |> #?0|kent:tls-openssl.git$ git alias|grep slpn |> alias.slpn log

Re: Congratulations! Missing 3.0.0 tag?

2021-09-09 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso
Randall S. Becker wrote in <012201d7a590$56df08d0$049d1a70$@nexbridge.com>: |On September 9, 2021 6:56 AM, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: |>Benjamin Kaduk wrote in |> <20210908233639.gy19...@akamai.com>: |>|On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 01:03:28AM +0200, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: ... |>|I think (off the

RE: Congratulations! Missing 3.0.0 tag?

2021-09-09 Thread Randall S. Becker
On September 9, 2021 3:26 PM, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: >To: Randall S. Becker >Cc: 'Benjamin Kaduk' ; openssl-users@openssl.org >Subject: Re: Congratulations! Missing 3.0.0 tag? > >Randall S. Becker wrote in > <012201d7a590$56df08d0$049d1a70$@nexbridge.com>: > |On September 9, 2021 6:56 AM,

RE: Congratulations! Missing 3.0.0 tag?

2021-09-09 Thread Randall S. Becker
On September 9, 2021 4:34 PM, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: >Randall S. Becker wrote in > <014c01d7a5b7$a0a7d1f0$e1f775d0$@nexbridge.com>: > ... > >You are right in everything that you say. > > |Strictly speaking, the signature on a tag is considered immutable and \ > |transitively applies the

Re: Congratulations! Missing 3.0.0 tag?

2021-09-09 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso
Randall S. Becker wrote in <014c01d7a5b7$a0a7d1f0$e1f775d0$@nexbridge.com>: ... You are right in everything that you say. |Strictly speaking, the signature on a tag is considered immutable and \ |transitively applies the signature to the commit (it does not really, \ |but the effect is the

Re: Congratulations! Missing 3.0.0 tag?

2021-09-09 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso
Randall S. Becker wrote in <015301d7a5be$22589940$6709cbc0$@nexbridge.com>: .. |cture" would have to reconstruct the Merkel Tree, which, even in SHA-1 \ Now you digress. But i had nothing to say from the start.. Good night! --steffen | |Der Kragenbaer,The moon bear, |der

Re: EVP_MAC_init - specify the hash algorithm

2021-09-09 Thread Ken Goldman
Where does one get the parameter values? E.g., where would I see the value strings for the EVP_MAC_new algorithm and the digest parameter values. I can guess HMAC and SHA256, but are they documented? Case sensitive? Which is preferred? You use EVP_MAC_new, which is undocumented. The doc

Re: EVP_MAC_init - specify the hash algorithm

2021-09-09 Thread Dr Paul Dale
My mistake, it's EVP_MAC_fetch not EVP_MAC_new. The names are all case insensitive and are documented in the man7 pages: https://www.openssl.org/docs/man3.0/man7/EVP_MAC-HMAC.html and https://www.openssl.org/docs/man3.0/man7/EVP_MD-SHA2.html. The HMAC parameter names and types are also