Ruiyuan Jiang wrote:
Hi, all
Does openssl 0.9.7g and 0.9.8 supports Solaris 10? The config command
passed but make failed for both version. Thanks.
what's the error message ?
Nils
__
OpenSSL Project
Hi,
I'm trying to build a PKCS7 envelopped data (encrypted) but when I'm
done withe the PKCS7 structure and I try to free it (calling PKCS7_free)
I keep getting an access violation accessing 0xfeeefef6.
I'm using openssl 0.9.8 under windows XP (win32).
Code is attached.
--
Alexandre
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to build a PKCS7 envelopped data (encrypted) but when I'm
done withe the PKCS7 structure and I try to free it (calling PKCS7_free)
I keep getting an access violation accessing 0xfeeefef6.
I'm using openssl 0.9.8 under
Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
Any reason you can't use PKCS7_encrypt() instead?
Unfortunately, I got the same result using PKCS7_encrypt().
--
Alexandre Belloni
__
OpenSSL Project
Never mind, Ramon. I think openssl 0.9.8 supports Solaris 10. The
problem that I had was that I did not update gcc header file. When I
installed pre-compiled gcc on the Solaris 10, there is an instruction
about to update gcc header file but I did not do that at the time. After
I updated gcc header
Hi,
Sorry if this is a bit OT, can someone explain what is the difference
between
an MS Authenticode certificate, a normal certificate, and a certificate
for signing Netscape object?
What are the bits and bytes that are different? I can't find info
detailed enough to give a satisfactory
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005, coco coco wrote:
Hi,
Sorry if this is a bit OT, can someone explain what is the difference
between
an MS Authenticode certificate, a normal certificate, and a certificate
for signing Netscape object?
What are the bits and bytes that are different? I can't find
Alexandre Belloni wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to build a PKCS7 envelopped data (encrypted) but when I'm
done withe the PKCS7 structure and I try to free it (calling PKCS7_free)
I keep getting an access violation accessing 0xfeeefef6.
I'm using openssl 0.9.8 under windows XP (win32).
Code is
This is another example of the problem I highlighted a few days ago. You
need to be very careful with which getter methods return a new instance
(or inc the ref count), and which ones do not.
Definitely not a bug but a matter of consistency.
Nils Larsch wrote:
Alexandre Belloni wrote:
Hi,
