Thanks,
This test programs works fine, so I think I need to check my signatures (as
David Schwartz mentioned too).
Best regards,
Frank Wockenfuß
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Marek Marcola
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. August
Hello,
RSA_NO_PADDING leads to the same error.
Exactly, this fails on first stage.
Maybe you can send (n,e) pair ?
Best regards,
--
Marek Marcola [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
OpenSSL Project
RSA_NO_PADDING leads to the same error.
Frank Wockenfuß
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Marek Marcola
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. August 2007 15:05
An: openssl-users@openssl.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: RSA_public_decrypt problem
Hello,
This test programs works fine, so I think I need to check my signatures (as
David Schwartz mentioned too).
Signature is not important when you do RSA_public_decrypt().
First you must decode data and after that you may try to interpret them.
Function RSA_public_decrypt() first performs
Hi.
I need to pull out the subject alternative name from the certificate and
than grab the 'otherName' type. When I look at V3_alt.c in 9.7d I'm
walking away with the impression that it isn't supported. Can somebody
confirm if this is the case or not? And if so is there a version of
OpenSSL
N:
008796FB4EAAB5FCC21619608ECB34D4BD82D062BF136A54E7E0BF6B2991C2F0F93A161930D650AF939C8282431D291D0E6E9F69A09AF091345D60439569C5CB5ECA566740B6A69FE4BBF2DB9CC03786AEDF8F9522EB7F6096A1B900140E6AA7AF55198B87E68A69546631E9EF90666984123F5364BE2EA6E067BBAA8831A34B15
E:
004081
Frank Wockenfuß
Maybe the leadings 00 is the problem with both?
Frank Wockenfuß
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Wockenfuß, Frank
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. August 2007 16:36
An: openssl-users@openssl.org
Betreff: AW: AW: AW: AW: AW:
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 09:48:39AM -0400, Eric Johnson wrote:
Hi.
I need to pull out the subject alternative name from the certificate and
than grab the 'otherName' type. When I look at V3_alt.c in 9.7d I'm
walking away with the impression that it isn't supported. Can somebody
confirm if
Hello,
N:
008796FB4EAAB5FCC21619608ECB34D4BD82D062BF136A54E7E0BF6B2991C2F0F93A161930D650AF939C8282431D291D0E6E9F69A09AF091345D60439569C5CB5ECA566740B6A69FE4BBF2DB9CC03786AEDF8F9522EB7F6096A1B900140E6AA7AF55198B87E68A69546631E9EF90666984123F5364BE2EA6E067BBAA8831A34B15
E:
004081
After
I have found the reason for the problem. Deep inside my program was a bug that
switched modulus and exponent, so I set the wrong values to n and e.
I've fixed the bug and also removed the leading 00 so that I get a good 128
byte long modulus and a 4 byte long exponent.
If I call RSA_verify I
Thank you. I'll give those a shot.
Eric Johnson
Nortel Networks
Sustaining Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Victor Duchovni
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 11:23 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re:
The problem with the NULL pointer exception was also my mistake.
But thanks to your program I found it and now -- ring ring -- I have a
decrypted content.
BUT
The content at my example is 128 byte long (as long as the RSA signature). The
original hash that was signed was 32 byte long.
I find
Hello,
The content at my example is 128 byte long (as long as the RSA signature).
The original hash that was signed was 32 byte long.
I find the orignial hash inside the decrypted content. It lays on the last 32
byte.
Before this is mostly FF. How do I surely get the original hash out of
Hello,
I have found the reason for the problem. Deep inside my program was a bug
that switched modulus and exponent, so I set the wrong values to n and e.
My first suggestion :-)
I've fixed the bug and also removed the leading 00 so that I get a good 128
byte long modulus and a 4 byte long
That's it!
Many thanks for the help!
Frank Wockenfuß
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Marek Marcola
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. August 2007 18:25
An: openssl-users@openssl.org
Betreff: Re: AW: RSA_public_decrypt problem UPDATE
I've been working on compiling mod_ssl.so for use with Apache 2.x on
Windows. Following the OpenSSLFips install instructions I am able to
build the FIPS modules and then build OpenSSL with those modules. I then
compile Apache using the OpenSSL built with the modules and it compiles.
Unfortunately,
Microsoft FIPS implementation is broken. I tried to use it with the GPO
enabled for communication between Postfix mail gateway and Exchange 2007 and it
did not work. Troubleshooting revealed the FIPS issue. I called into
Microsoft and they are aware of the problem, however they have no plans
17 matches
Mail list logo