> From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On Behalf Of Philip R. Landreth
> Sent: Friday, 13 January, 2012 09:55
> The files were given to me in .txt format and the original file is a
> .txt. as for the "keyfile" being in .txt I don't know. I used -p to
> print the key and iv and used those instead
> From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org On Behalf Of Suter, Ray CTR NAVAIR,
724000D
> Sent: Friday, 13 January, 2012 11:18
> Is there a way to remove a cipher completely from ever being
> used? We use retina and it is picking up
> DES-CBC-SHA and I need to remove it from being used, seen, or
>
On Mon January 16 2012, Nathan Smyth wrote:
> Yes, strangely this doesn't help. Actually, what I do is set the socket to
> non-blocking AFTER the SSL handshake, which I thought should work...
>
> Could there be some issue with numerous SSL connections between the same
> parties? Or maybe it's
>
you should be setting the non blocking thing before the ssl connect is
called, which is part of the SSL handshake. SSL_connect will internally do
socket read/write, so if its blocking then it will not come out until the
underlying operation is completed. setting it after the SSL connect is
done, wi
Yes, strangely this doesn't help. Actually, what I do is set the socket to
non-blocking AFTER the SSL handshake, which I thought should work...
Could there be some issue with numerous SSL connections between the same
parties? Or maybe it's some threading issue - perhaps SSL has some special
con
did you try making use of non blocking fd? it cannot deadlock in if you use
that.
Thanks
--Gayathri
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Nathan Smyth wrote:
> Just seeking advice/things to consider for deadlock (or 'wait') on a
> SSL_Connect(). Unfortunately it stalls here, so there's no return co
Just seeking advice/things to consider for deadlock (or 'wait') on a
SSL_Connect(). Unfortunately it stalls here, so there's no return code.
The project establishes a number of SSL conns between various application
instances. It's in C++, where standard socket libs are used to establish the
con
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012, Eisenacher, Patrick wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Steffen DETTMER
> >
> > * Johannes Bauer wrote on Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 14:22 +0100:
> > [...]
> > > >>> Or, in other words: Let's assume I have a ultimate root
> > > >>> (self-signed) "Root" and a branched C
> -Original Message-
> From: Steffen DETTMER
>
> * Johannes Bauer wrote on Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 14:22 +0100:
> [...]
> > >>> Or, in other words: Let's assume I have a ultimate root
> > >>> (self-signed) "Root" and a branched CA "X". I would like to
> > >>> trust "X" and all it's children,
