adding certificate policies extension in CSR

2013-09-09 Thread phildoch
Hello, I am trying to add a certificate policies extension in CSR. For this I am using the openssl sample function mkreq() in file openssl/demos/x509/openssl/demos/x509/mkreq.c This the line of code I added: add_ext(exts, NID_certificate_policies, 1.3.6.1); Unfortunately it causes a

Re: adding certificate policies extension in CSR

2013-09-09 Thread Willy Weisz
Hi, Am 09.09.2013 10:37, schrieb phildoch: Hello, I am trying to add a certificate policies extension in CSR. For this I am using the openssl sample function mkreq() in file openssl/demos/x509/openssl/demos/x509/mkreq.c What do you want it for? What does it mean that the certificate

Re: adding certificate policies extension in CSR

2013-09-09 Thread phildoch
Oh I see. Can you point to a documentation where it is defined which extensions a certificate requestor is allowed to add and which should be added by the CA only? Thanks. -- View this message in context:

Re: [openssl-users] Re: adding certificate policies extension in CSR

2013-09-09 Thread Erwann Abalea
The requestor is allowed to ask for any extension it wants. The CA will do its job, ignore those requested extensions, and place the good ones in the certificate. It can also change the subject name contained in the certificate. -- Erwann ABALEA Le 09/09/2013 11:21, phildoch a écrit : Oh I

Re: [openssl-users] Re: adding certificate policies extension in CSR

2013-09-09 Thread phildoch
Ok. So meanwhile, unless it will be proven that is is illegal, let's say that for any reason the Certificate requester wants to add a certificate policies extension in the CSR. Is this syntax correct:? add_ext(exts, NID_certificate_policies, 1.3.6.1); (based on function mkreq() in file

Re: [openssl-users] Re: adding certificate policies extension in CSR

2013-09-09 Thread Willy Weisz
Am 09.09.2013 12:13, schrieb phildoch: Ok. So meanwhile, unless it will be proven that is is illegal, Looking at the IETF RFCs, none that I found explicitly or implicitly indicated a meaningful use of the certificate policies entry in a CSR. On the other hand the semantics of this entry means

Bidirectional socket communication and SSL_renegotiate.

2013-09-09 Thread Karthik Krishnamurthy
Hi, The client and server that I have in my project runs in a simple 1 socket, blocking mode environment. The model is that of a typical producer-consumer one. The client produces data, sends it to the server. The server consumes it. Once in a while, the server sends a control message to the

Which version of net-snmp is compatible with openssl-1.0.1e

2013-09-09 Thread zheng liu
Hello, I have compiled net-snmp-5.5.2 with openssl-1.0.1e, and find it can not success in windows OS. At last I realize net-snmp-5.5.2 is not compatible with openssl-1.0.1e. So I want to know which version of net-snmp is right under openssl-1.0.1e environment. Hope your quick answer, thank

support for CAdES

2013-09-09 Thread Ottavio Campana
Hello, I am trying to understand if CAdES is supported in OpenSSL 1.0.1e. I don't find nay trace of it, neither positively nor negatively. Maybe I misunderstood the relationship between CAdES and CMS... Can anyone help me please to understand if CAdES is going to be added to openssl, or if I am