detect Md5 sign signatures

2013-09-24 Thread val john
Hi guys i have server certificate used in company Radius server , i how can check wheather its a md5 sign cert or sha sign certificate . which attribute that indicate whether its md5 sign or sha sign ? is iSignature Algorithm: sha1WithRSAEncryptiot attribute Please advice Thank You John

Exclusive Use of the FIPS Object Module

2013-09-24 Thread Jim Adams
The Security Policy for the FIPS Object Module 2.0 states: 5.1 Exclusive Use of the FIPS Object Module for Cryptography In order for the referencing application to claim FIPS 140-2 validation, all cryptographic functions utilized by the application must be provided exclusively by the FIPS Object

Dual_EC_DRBG

2013-09-24 Thread yustein
Hi, Does OpenSSL use this by default, if not where do a user choose which method to use for CSPRNG? Thanks, Tony -- View this message in context: http://openssl.6102.n7.nabble.com/Dual-EC-DRBG-tp46628.html Sent from the OpenSSL - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Exclusive Use of the FIPS Object Module

2013-09-24 Thread Steve Marquess
On 09/23/2013 04:16 PM, Jim Adams wrote: The Security Policy for the FIPS Object Module 2.0 states: 5.1 Exclusive Use of the FIPS Object Module for Cryptography In order for the referencing application to claim FIPS 140-2 validation, all cryptographic functions utilized by the application

Re: Dual_EC_DRBG

2013-09-24 Thread Dr. Stephen Henson
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013, yustein wrote: Hi, Does OpenSSL use this by default, if not where do a user choose which method to use for CSPRNG? The default DRBG for OpenSSL is 256 bit AES CTR_DRBG. The default can be changed by using the compile time flags: -DOPENSSL_DRBG_DEFAULT_TYPE=type

Re: Dual_EC_DRBG

2013-09-24 Thread Tony Yustein
Thanks a lot! :) Tony Sent from my iPhone On Sep 24, 2013, at 2:27 PM, Dr. Stephen Henson st...@openssl.org wrote: On Mon, Sep 23, 2013, yustein wrote: Hi, Does OpenSSL use this by default, if not where do a user choose which method to use for CSPRNG? The default DRBG for OpenSSL

Re: using TRNG via /dev/random

2013-09-24 Thread Richard Könning
Am 23.09.2013 21:59, schrieb starlight.201...@binnacle.cx: At 20:27 9/23/2013 +0200, Richard Könning wrote: /dev/random is a PRNG which blocks when the (crude) entropy estimation of the entropy pool falls below a limit. Besides this there are afaik no big differences between /dev/random and

Re: using TRNG via /dev/random

2013-09-24 Thread Richard Könning
Am 24.09.2013 02:05, schrieb starlight.201...@binnacle.cx: At 12:59 9/23/2013 -0700, Michael Sierchio wrote: I'll repeat myself - the fact that the /dev/random implementation you're using blocks is a serious design flaw. Convince Linus, the GPG developers et al.--not me. No one has to

Re: Dual_EC_DRBG

2013-09-24 Thread Steve Marquess
On 09/24/2013 07:27 AM, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote: ... Future versions of OpenSSL will fail if an attempt is made to use the Dual EC DRBG. Note we're also looking into removing Dual EC DRBG from the OpenSSL FIPS Object Module, a more difficult proposition as there are strict restrictions on

Re: Dual_EC_DRBG

2013-09-24 Thread yustein
Thanks :) Sent from my iPhone On Sep 24, 2013, at 4:28 PM, Steve Marquess-3 [via OpenSSL] ml-node+s6102n4664...@n7.nabble.com wrote: On 09/24/2013 07:27 AM, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote: ... Future versions of OpenSSL will fail if an attempt is made to use the Dual EC DRBG.

RE: detect Md5 sign signatures

2013-09-24 Thread Derek Del Miller
The Signature Algorithm field is the correct field to check. As clarification: MD5 is not a signature algorithm, it's a hashing algorithm. A certificate is hashed using the specified hashing algorithm, and then signed using the specified signature algorithm. Thus, sha1WithRSAEncryption

Re: using TRNG via /dev/random

2013-09-24 Thread Roberto Spadim
There's space to create a new random device at /dev if you want too =) /dev/nbrandom ? no block random? :) 2013/9/24 Richard Könning richard.koenn...@ts.fujitsu.com: Am 24.09.2013 02:05, schrieb starlight.201...@binnacle.cx: At 12:59 9/23/2013 -0700, Michael Sierchio wrote: I'll repeat