Hi everyone,
sorry for bothering you with the questions related with session resumption,
I've checked the mailing list and found no such discussion about it before.
Does OpenSSL support the session reused automatically and periodically? For
the case of session renegotiation, there is
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014, Raghav Varadan wrote:
Hi All,
I'm trying to build an application that used fips capable openssl which I
built for Mac osx 32 bit. Now I would like to embed the checksum into the
application binary. I checked the fips user guide and I don't see any
specific for OSX. I
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014, Michel wrote:
Hi,
My build failed when compiling openssl 1.0.2 beta 1 with
no-nextprotoneg defined :
.\ssl\s3_clnt.c(413) : error C2065: 'SSL3_ST_CW_SUPPLEMENTAL_DATA_A'
I solved this just by moving line 636 of ssl3.h 3 lines above.
Diff file is attached.
Thanks
Hi,
My build failed when compiling openssl 1.0.2 beta 1 with no-nextprotoneg
defined :
.\ssl\s3_clnt.c(413) : error C2065: 'SSL3_ST_CW_SUPPLEMENTAL_DATA_A'
I solved this just by moving line 636 of ssl3.h 3 lines above.
Diff file is attached.
Regards,
--- D:/openssl-1.0.2-beta1/ssl/ssl3.h
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
What are the limits on PEM_write_RSAPrivateKey and EVP_CIPHER? Is it
possible to use 256-bit security levels with authentication tags?
I could not get AES-256-HMAC-SHA-256 or AES-256-CBC-HMAC-SHA1 to
work, and I could not get AES-256-GCM to work.
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 10:13:02AM +0100, Jin Jiang wrote:
Does OpenSSL support the session reused automatically and periodically?
On servers, by default there is an in-memory session cache, and
there are optional callbacks for an out-of-process session cache.
You can control the size of the
Hi all.
Why does the AES key wrap feature does not work in FIPS mode of the latest
FIPS-approved OpenSSL anymore?
Thank you
De
From: Dr. Stephen Henson st...@openssl.org
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Date: 02/28/2014 04:26 AM
Subject:Re: FIPS Openssl for Mac OSX 32 bit
Sent
On 20 December 2013 09:09, Patrick McCorry [hidden email] wrote:
Thanks Guys,
At the moment I'm trying to distinguish if n p, as the x co-ordinate
does not wrap around n (so x = r in all cases) - to verify if this is
always the case
n can be greater than p, e.g. see the definition of
Thank you so much for the clarification.
For building my windows application, I used the fipslink.pl during the link
phase to embed the checksum. But later I figured that the utility msincore
can also read through the coff executable to embed the checksum. I
obviously wanted to confirm that
On 28 February 2014 17:07, Paddy stonecold...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 December 2013 09:09, Patrick McCorry [hidden email] wrote:
Thanks Guys,
At the moment I'm trying to distinguish if n p, as the x co-ordinate
does not wrap around n (so x = r in all cases) - to verify if this is
always the
Hi folks,
I'm new to this list, so please forgive me if this is a repeat question,
but I was wondering if, now that 1.0.2 has Suite B enforcement for
TLS/DTLS, there were any plans to support enforcing Suite B in
libcrypto?
Many thanks,
/jtt
My understanding is that k . G = (x,y)
And under the hood, 0 = x = p and 0 = y = p.
Then the next step I believe is r = x mod n and NOT r = x mod p
So in this case, because p n - then x will wrap around the modulus from
time to time?
Otherwise, if it is r = x mod p, then x will never
I'm building a ca cert following .../demos/mkcert.c. The program is failing at:
X509_EXTENSION* ex4 =
X509V3_EXT_conf_nid(NULL, NULL, NID_subject_key_identifier, hash);
err = ERR_get_error();
...
$ openssl errstr 0x22073072
error:22073072:X509 V3 routines:S2I_SKEY_ID:no public key
The
13 matches
Mail list logo
