Hi OpenSSL team,
How can I find out if authorized_keys2 is read in Openssh version 4.x/5.x? I
understand that this is deprecated from version 3.0 onwards, but release notes
of version 3.0 just says that," Future releases are likely not to read these
files." So I am not able to tell for sure
On 04/08/2016 19:19, Jakob Bohm wrote:
I am trying to build the OpenSSL 1.0.2h ARM optimized assembler
routines for Apple iOS (the default build config doesn't do that
yet).
However the Apple version of the LLVM 7.3.0 ARM assembler seems
to reject some of the notation used by the current source
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016, William King wrote:
>
>
> Does the BIO_seek() not handle incrementing or decrementing the IV
> counter? is there a callback that needs to be set to calculate what the
> IV counter value should be for a given file position for the cipher?
>
Calling BIO_seek() on a chain
> Does the BIO_seek() not handle incrementing or decrementing the IV
> counter? is there a callback that needs to be set to calculate what the IV
> counter value should be for a given file position for the cipher?
It does not.
--
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe:
Same decryption issue happens if I run something like:
char buffer[1024] = {}, buffer2[1024] = {0};
size_t pos = BIO_tell(enc);
BIO_read(enc, buffer, 1024);
BIO_seek(enc, pos);
BIO_read(enc, buffer2, 1024);
if (memcmp(buffer, buffer2, 1024)) {
printf("Mismatched\n");
} else {
printf("Matched\n");
Without any of the error checking code in place, this is what I'm testing:
/* START CODE BLOCK */
const EVP_CIPHER *cipher = EVP_aes_256_ctr();
const EVP_MD *digest = EVP_sha256();
BIO *enc = BIO_new(BIO_f_cipher());
BIO *in = BIO_new(BIO_s_file());
EVP_CIPHER_CTX *ctx = NULL;
char *path =
The -Ddouble=long hack might very well cause problems with standard headers.
I’m assuming you are not talking about x86 or any other platform for which
there is assembly support.
In such a case, I suggest #ifdef’ing out the code that you don’t care about,
and making it into a configuration
There is no test. That fix can be applied. 1.0.0 is really old and
unsupported, you should upgrade as soon as possible
--
Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies
IM: richs...@jabber.at Twitter: RichSalz
From: siva gopi raju kudeti [mailto:sivagopi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2016
Hi OpenSSL team,
I am using openssl-1.0.0e in my product. Here i want to know that OpenSSL
is CVE-2016-2180 vulnerable or not.
https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/0ed26acce328ec16a3aa635f1ca373
65e8c7403a?diff=unified
In this page showing some modifications to the function
