Re: [openssl-users] 1.1.1 pre1 tests failing on Solaris SPARC

Morning Dennis, et al This may be off thread topic, but one thing I have noticed with the x86 openssl builds shipped by Oracle and Blastwave in the releases I have been testing FooCrypt against ( 10u11 through 11.3 ) is that openssl seems to ‘HANG’ when inputting a string greater than 262

Re: [openssl-users] 1.1.1 pre1 tests failing on Solaris SPARC

On 24/02/18 02:18 PM, Erik Forsberg wrote: -- Original Message -- As for -lm, which symbol was undefined? Undefined   first referenced   symbol in file fabs    test/ct_test.o ??? One can only wonder where does

Re: [openssl-users] 1.1.1 pre1 tests failing on Solaris SPARC

>-- Original Message -- > > As for -lm, which symbol was undefined? > Undefined   first referenced   symbol in file fabs    test/ct_test.o >>> >>> ??? One can only wonder where does it come

Re: [openssl-users] 1.1.1 pre1 tests failing on Solaris SPARC

>-- Original Message -- > >>> As for -lm, which symbol was undefined? >>> >> >> Undefined   first referenced >>  symbol in file >> fabs    test/ct_test.o > >??? One can only wonder where does it come from. I see no fabs

Re: [openssl-users] 1.1.1 pre1 tests failing on Solaris SPARC

as that is the ONLY -lm reference and the fact its in test code, why not simply avoid using fabs(), that is so trivial here ? if (value < 0) value = -value; >-- Original Message -- > >On 24/02/18 04:47 AM, Andy Polyakov wrote: >>> So testsuite is running but this is a non-optimal debug

Re: [openssl-users] 1.1.1 pre1 tests failing on Solaris SPARC

> As for -lm, which symbol was undefined? > Undefined   first referenced   symbol in file fabs    test/ct_test.o >>> >>> ??? One can only wonder where does it come from. I see no fabs >>>

Re: [openssl-users] 1.1.1 pre1 tests failing on Solaris SPARC

As for -lm, which symbol was undefined? >>> >>> Undefined   first referenced >>>   symbol in file >>> fabs    test/ct_test.o >> >> ??? One can only wonder where does it come from. I see no fabs >> anywhere...

Re: [openssl-users] 1.1.1 pre1 tests failing on Solaris SPARC

In message on Sat, 24 Feb 2018 13:51:45 +0100, Andy Polyakov said: appro> >> As for -lm, which symbol was undefined? appro> >> appro> > appro> > Undefined   first referenced appro> >  symbol   

Re: [openssl-users] 1.1.1 pre1 tests failing on Solaris SPARC

In message on Sat, 24 Feb 2018 06:14:50 -0500, Dennis Clarke said: dclarke> On 24/02/18 05:13 AM, Richard Levitte wrote: dclarke> > In message <607c8d70-4283-1b55-2eac-c9f30a3a3...@blastwave.org> on dclarke> > Sat, 24

Re: [openssl-users] 1.1.1 pre1 tests failing on Solaris SPARC

On 24/02/18 07:51 AM, Andy Polyakov wrote: As for -lm, which symbol was undefined? Undefined   first referenced  symbol in file fabs    test/ct_test.o ??? One can only wonder where does it come from. I see no fabs

Re: [openssl-users] 1.1.1 pre1 tests failing on Solaris SPARC

>> As for -lm, which symbol was undefined? >> > > Undefined   first referenced >  symbol in file > fabs    test/ct_test.o ??? One can only wonder where does it come from. I see no fabs anywhere... There also was remark

Re: [openssl-users] 1.1.1 pre1 tests failing on Solaris SPARC

On 24/02/18 05:13 AM, Richard Levitte wrote: In message <607c8d70-4283-1b55-2eac-c9f30a3a3...@blastwave.org> on Sat, 24 Feb 2018 00:24:34 -0500, Dennis Clarke said: dclarke> Not sure why but the various scripts and test files are hell dclarke> bent on using the perl in

Re: [openssl-users] 1.1.1 pre1 tests failing on Solaris SPARC

On 24/02/18 05:13 AM, Richard Levitte wrote: In message <607c8d70-4283-1b55-2eac-c9f30a3a3...@blastwave.org> on Sat, 24 Feb 2018 00:24:34 -0500, Dennis Clarke said: dclarke> Not sure why but the various scripts and test files are hell dclarke> bent on using the perl in

Re: [openssl-users] 1.1.1 pre1 tests failing on Solaris SPARC

On 24/02/18 04:47 AM, Andy Polyakov wrote: So testsuite is running but this is a non-optimal debug build and only on the Fujitsu sparc and not on a baseline v9 yet. See "e_flags" in the ELF header below which is somewhat restrictive.   e_flags:    [ EF_SPARCV9_TSO EF_SPARC_SUN_US1

Re: [openssl-users] 1.1.1 pre1 tests failing on Solaris SPARC

In message <607c8d70-4283-1b55-2eac-c9f30a3a3...@blastwave.org> on Sat, 24 Feb 2018 00:24:34 -0500, Dennis Clarke said: dclarke> Not sure why but the various scripts and test files are hell dclarke> bent on using the perl in the system as opposed to what I dclarke> have

Re: [openssl-users] OpenSSL 1.1.1pre1 fails to build on AIX 7.1

Oh, it's passed alright, but no command flag is passed. The attached patch (which is currently in master and will therefore be part of the next pre-release) fixes it. Cheers, Richard In message <793d23fd-5c34-880a-c8da-d5ea66061...@gemtalksystems.com> on Fri, 23 Feb 2018 14:31:49 -0800, Norm

Re: [openssl-users] 1.1.1 pre1 tests failing on Solaris SPARC

> So testsuite is running but this is a non-optimal debug build and only > on the Fujitsu sparc and not on a baseline v9 yet. See "e_flags" in the > ELF header below which is somewhat restrictive. > >   e_flags:    [ EF_SPARCV9_TSO EF_SPARC_SUN_US1 EF_SPARC_SUN_US3 ] If "somewhat restrictive"

Re: [openssl-users] OpenSSL 1.1.1pre1 fails to build on AIX 7.1

> Looks like no target .a file is passed to ar ? > > Note: OpenSSL 1.1.0 succeeds on this platform. > > > /export/localnew/RISC6000.AIX/perl-5.24.0/bin/perl -i -pe 's/^.*\|//; s/ > \/(\\.|[^ ])*//; $_ = undef if (/: *$/ || /^(#.*| *)$/); $_.="\n" unless > !defined($_) or /\R$/g;'