On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 11:41 AM Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> > On Nov 23, 2018, at 2:25 PM, Sam Roberts wrote:
> >
> > In 1.1.0j, if SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list() is called with "not-a-cipher"
> > or "rc4", then SSL_R_NO_CIPHER_MATCH will occur.
> >
> > In 1.1.1a, set_cipher_list() suceeds, seems to
> On Nov 23, 2018, at 2:25 PM, Sam Roberts wrote:
>
> In 1.1.0j, if SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list() is called with "not-a-cipher"
> or "rc4", then SSL_R_NO_CIPHER_MATCH will occur.
>
> In 1.1.1a, set_cipher_list() suceeds, seems to return the complete
> cipher list (should it do this?) but later
I'm seeing the following link failure on Solaris, both SPARC and x86_64
with 1.1.1a. 1.1.1 does not have this problem. Adding -lcrypto to the
link line makes the problem go away.
Any suggestions on how to proceed?
Norm Green
rm -f test/rsa_complex
${LDCMD:-/opt/studio12.5/bin/cc} -m64
In 1.1.0j, if SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list() is called with "not-a-cipher"
or "rc4", then SSL_R_NO_CIPHER_MATCH will occur.
In 1.1.1a, set_cipher_list() suceeds, seems to return the complete
cipher list (should it do this?) but later ssl_cipher_list_to_bytes()
will find that ssl_cipher_disabled() is
In message on Fri, 23
Nov 2018 10:33:48 +, openssl-users-requ...@openssl.org said:
> Hi,
>
> In this snippet,
>
>DH *dh;
> if ((dh->g = BN_new()) == NULL)-> 1
> goto end;
> if (!BN_set_word(dh->g, g))
On 23/11/2018 10:33, priya p wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In this snippet,
>
> DH *dh;
> if ((dh->g = BN_new()) == NULL)-> 1
> goto end;
> if (!BN_set_word(dh->g, g)) ---> 2
> goto end;
>
Hi,
In this snippet,
DH *dh;
if ((dh->g = BN_new()) == NULL)-> 1
goto end;
if (!BN_set_word(dh->g, g)) ---> 2
goto end;
Here as we can't reference dh structure members directly, how can
