On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 03:54:48PM -0800, Sam Roberts wrote:
> And is it possible that this is different for TLS1.2 and 1.3?
The resumption API is the same. However, because in TLS 1.3, session
tickets are sent *after* the completion of the handshake, it is
possible that the session handle
And is it possible that this is different for TLS1.2 and 1.3?
Using TLS1.3, SSL_session_reused() is always returning false, I'm not
sure if that's because I'm doing something else wrong, and the ticket
is not being accepted and a full handshake is occurring, or if the API
literally only signals
Dear Hubert,
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 6:52 PM Hubert Kario wrote:
> On Thursday, 31 January 2019 11:09:00 CET Dmitry Belyavsky wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > What is best practice to add own object identifiers to the
> crypto/objects/*
> > files?
> >
> > It's not a problem to add all the necessary
On Thursday, 31 January 2019 11:09:00 CET Dmitry Belyavsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> What is best practice to add own object identifiers to the crypto/objects/*
> files?
>
> It's not a problem to add all the necessary strings to the
> crypto/objects/objects.txt file and invoke 'make
Hi all,
So, I found some hints on stack overflow
(https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6772465/is-there-any-c-api-in-openssl-to-derive-a-key-from-given-string)
and an implementation with pyCrypto
(https://gist.github.com/mimoo/11383475).
I still can't get the expected results but these raise some
