Sure, I can help.
It's my pleasure to help with the project.
Since you have opened an issue. Then what should I do?
Nicola Tuveri 于2020年4月24日周五 下午11:17写道：
> That's right! Thanks Viktor for pointing that out!!
>
> I just opened an issue to track this:
>
I would normally refrain but ...
On 25/04/2020 23:24, Salz, Rich via openssl-users wrote:
Yes, nice, why not reduce compile time and save prescious compiler
memory by getting rid of all-inline one-liners.
And link-time collapsing the identical code. I think this is an issue on some
Salz, Rich wrote in
<05c099a8-261f-43df-a59a-97ccf030f...@akamai.com>:
|>Yes, nice, why not reduce compile time and save prescious compiler
|memory by getting rid of all-inline one-liners.
|
|And link-time collapsing the identical code. I think this is an issue \
|on some Solaris,
>Yes, nice, why not reduce compile time and save prescious compiler
memory by getting rid of all-inline one-liners.
And link-time collapsing the identical code. I think this is an issue on some
Solaris, for example.
> Sorry for coming
over sarcastic, i am listening to "This
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 01:26:05PM +0200, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
> - DH_bits(dh) (used for logging only in httpd)
> Replaced by BN_num_bits(DH_get0_p(dh)).
> Not sure this one should be deprecated, it seems to be used in several
> places in openssl codebase still, no replacement?
I think the
Hello Rich Salz,
Salz, Rich wrote in
:
|>I do not understand one thing at the moment. If i use
|no-deprecated then the stack handling is not available:
|
|If you use no-deprecated you have to use DEFINE_STACK_OF in exactly \
|one file. And use DECLARE_STACK in your common header
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 11:02:47AM +0200, Michael Tuexen wrote:
> > On 22. Apr 2020, at 10:38, Matt Caswell wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 21/04/2020 23:45, Michael Tuexen wrote:
> >>> Looks like the failing call is here:
> >>>
> >>> if (setsockopt(sock, IPPROTO_IPV6, IPV6_V6ONLY,
> >>>
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
<20200425210613.scjxn%stef...@sdaoden.eu>:
|Hello once more.
|
|OpenSSL wrote in
|<20200423142936.ga24...@openssl.org>:
|| OpenSSL version 3.0 alpha 1 released
|
|I do not understand one thing at the moment. If i use
|no-deprecated then the stack handling is
>I do not understand one thing at the moment. If i use
no-deprecated then the stack handling is not available:
If you use no-deprecated you have to use DEFINE_STACK_OF in exactly one file.
And use DECLARE_STACK in your common header file.
Let me know if this works, or not, for you.
Hello once more.
OpenSSL wrote in
<20200423142936.ga24...@openssl.org>:
| OpenSSL version 3.0 alpha 1 released
I do not understand one thing at the moment. If i use
no-deprecated then the stack handling is not available:
/*
* If we're building OpenSSL, or we have no-deprecated
10 matches
Mail list logo
