Hi Team,
I want to upgrade the openssl version from 3.0.2 to 3.0.7. My OS version is
Ubuntu 22.04.1 LTS (Jammy Jellyfish). Please help .It is urgent.
Regards,
Anupam
这是一封自动回复邮件。已经收到您的来信，我会尽快回复。
On Wed, Nov 02, 2022 at 11:17:31PM +, Steven_M.irc via openssl-users wrote:
> I'm really worried about the vulnerabilities recently found in OpenSSL
> versions 3.0.0 - 3.0.6.
Just upgrade any affected systems and you'll be fine.
> If I understand things correctly (and please do correct me
Hi All,
I'm really worried about the vulnerabilities recently found in OpenSSL versions
3.0.0 - 3.0.6. If I understand things correctly (and please do correct me if
I'm wrong), it doesn't matter which version of OpenSSL clients are running,
only which version of OpenSSL *servers* are running.
Michael Wojcik wrote in
:
|> From: openssl-users On Behalf \
|> Of Phillip
|> Susi
|> Sent: Wednesday, 2 November, 2022 11:45
|>
|> The only thing to fix is don't put your compiler in strict C90 mode.
|
|I'm inclined to agree. While there's an argument for backward compatibil\
|ity,
> From: Felipe Gasper
> Sent: Wednesday, 2 November, 2022 12:46
>
> I wouldn’t normally expect EPIPE from a read operation. I get why it happens;
> it just seems odd. Given that it’s legitimate for a TLS peer to send the
> close_notify and then immediately do TCP close, it also seems like EPIPE
On 11/2/22 18:29, Michael Wojcik via openssl-users wrote:
From: openssl-users On Behalf Of Phillip
Susi
Sent: Wednesday, 2 November, 2022 11:45
The only thing to fix is don't put your compiler in strict C90 mode.
I'm inclined to agree. While there's an argument for backward compatibility,
> On Oct 26, 2022, at 13:34, Michael Wojcik via openssl-users
> wrote:
>
>> From: openssl-users On Behalf Of Felipe
>> Gasper
>> Sent: Wednesday, 26 October, 2022 11:15
>>
>> I’m seeing that OpenSSL 3, when it reads empty on a socket, sends some
>> sort of response, e.g.:
>>
>> -
> From: openssl-users On Behalf Of Phillip
> Susi
> Sent: Wednesday, 2 November, 2022 11:45
>
> The only thing to fix is don't put your compiler in strict C90 mode.
I'm inclined to agree. While there's an argument for backward compatibility,
C99 was standardized nearly a quarter of a century
Dennis Clarke via openssl-users writes:
> On 11/2/22 07:30, Tomas Mraz wrote:
>> No, long long and unsigned long long is required and it was required
>> for quite some time. The code is mostly C90 but not strictly.
>> I suppose on platforms with 64bit long type we could make it work
>> without
On 11/2/22 07:30, Tomas Mraz wrote:
No, long long and unsigned long long is required and it was required
for quite some time. The code is mostly C90 but not strictly.
I suppose on platforms with 64bit long type we could make it work
without long long though. Pull requests are welcome.
Tomas
On Wed, 2 Nov 2022 at 18:40, Jochen Bern wrote:
> On 02.11.22 07:48, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
> > I have 2 internet-facing CentOS 7.9 Linux servers in Europe.
> > Are the patches available already? How do I patch OpenSSL on my CentOS
> 7.9
> > Linux servers?
>
> CentOS 7 does not
Anupam,
please don’t attempt to install an openssl version which you built yourself to
your Linux system, it might brake your applications. Your Linux distribution
(Ubuntu) installs their own compiled versions which you can upgrade using its
package manager (apt)
Regards,
Matthias
From:
On 02.11.22 07:48, Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming wrote:
I have 2 internet-facing CentOS 7.9 Linux servers in Europe.
Are the patches available already? How do I patch OpenSSL on my CentOS 7.9
Linux servers?
CentOS 7 does not come with 3.0 versions of OpenSSL. (Not even available
from
Hi Team,
I want to upgrade openssl from 3.0.2 to 3.0.7. I have downloaded 3.0.7 from
https://www.openssl.org/source and installed successfully. But, still it is
showing version 3.0.2.Please help. It's urgent.
My OS: 22.04.1 LTS (Jammy Jellyfish)
Regards,
Anupam
On Wed, 2 Nov 2022 at 18:38, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> In general unless you've built and installed your own build of OpenSSL
> you need to refer to the vendor of your operating system for patches.
>
> In particular the openssl packages in CentOS 7.9 are not affected given
> they are 1.0.2 version and
In general unless you've built and installed your own build of OpenSSL
you need to refer to the vendor of your operating system for patches.
In particular the openssl packages in CentOS 7.9 are not affected given
they are 1.0.2 version and not 3.0.x version.
Tomas Mraz, OpenSSL
On Wed,
No, long long and unsigned long long is required and it was required
for quite some time. The code is mostly C90 but not strictly.
I suppose on platforms with 64bit long type we could make it work
without long long though. Pull requests are welcome.
Tomas Mraz, OpenSSL
On Tue, 2022-11-01 at
Subject: CVE-2022-3602 and CVE-2022-3786 Critical OpenSSL 3.0.x security
vulnerabilities
Good day from Singapore,
I refer to the following posts.
[1] OpenSSL Gives Heads Up to Critical Vulnerability Disclosure, Check
Point Alerts Organizations to Prepare Now
Link:
19 matches
Mail list logo
