(), then in callback
X509_STORE_CTX_get_current_cert()
2. SSL_get_peer_certificate()
--
Best Regards,
Serj Rakitov
___
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
pointer to one of the specific key types, such as rsa_st. rsa_st is defined in rsa.h, and if we look there we see that it contains all the RSA parameters, so it implicitly contains both the public and private key. Michael Wojcik Technology Specialist, Micro Focus --Best Regards, Serj Rakitov
k you for answers. I will try. --Best Regards, Serj Rakitov
___
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
these situations or how to perform a
rehandshake?
Best Regards,
Serj Rakitov
___
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
Regards,
Serj Rakitov
___
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
11.03.2015, 20:38, Salz, Rich rs...@akamai.com:
Many servers have disabled client-initiated renegotation.
I thought you were testing your client/server.
Yes I want to test my own client and server. I don't disable renegotation
manually. I don't know how to do this. Maybe it disabled by
11.03.2015, 20:22, Ken Goldman kgold...@us.ibm.com:
I would like to use the Shining Light precompiled openssl binaries
within Visual Studio.
I can dynamic link with gcc and the libraries in OpenSSL/lib/MinGW
I can static link with VS and the libraries in OpenSSL/lib/VC/static
When I
11.03.2015, 20:22, Ken Goldman kgold...@us.ibm.com:
I would like to use the Shining Light precompiled openssl binaries
within Visual Studio.
I can dynamic link with gcc and the libraries in OpenSSL/lib/MinGW
I can static link with VS and the libraries in OpenSSL/lib/VC/static
When I
10.03.2015, 21:40, Salz, Rich rs...@akamai.com:
Yes.
You probably need more than that. :) Take a look at the apps/s_client and
look for the 'R' constant to see how to do client-initiated reneg.
I have took a look at the apps/s_client.
I see only several lines of code about renegotiation:
11.03.2015, 08:20, Kurt Roeckx k...@roeckx.be:
The mta.opensslfoundation.net was only very temporary and should
not be used. openssl-users@openssl.org works just fine and
doesn't have any delay for me.
Ok.
You can always check the headers
why or where it has any delay.
It's not so
SSL_do_handshake (WANT_READ/WANT_WRITE)
How to make a rehandshake from server side?
--
Best Regards,
Serj Rakitov
___
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
Thanks, Graham.
Sorry for too late answer ))
Now i am testing...
21.02.2015, 14:42, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm:
On 21 Feb 2015, at 12:58 PM, Serj Rakitov ra...@yandex.com wrote:
I set socket to non-blocking mode.
1. If I do SSL_read() and get result =0 and then SSL_get_error
Nobody knows?
Does OpenSSL support renegotiation?
I will be very grateful for answers because there is no any info about this in
the net.
09.03.2015, 00:36, Serj Rakitov ra...@yandex.com:
Hello
I want to test SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ/SSL_ERROR_WANT_WRITE.
I have client and server. Server
Nobody knows?
09.03.2015, 15:30, Serj Rakitov ra...@yandex.com:
I have to open discussion again.
I want to test situations when SSL_read WANT_WRITE and SSL_write WANT_READ.
But I can't do this. SSL_read never wants write and SSL_write never wants
read!
I don't know how to catch
Hi,
I managed to do a renegotiation.
My mistake was that I start renegotiation when not all data were received or
sended.
Probably there was a situation when not all packets(records) were processed and
i got a error: unexpected record or bad length.
Really only one function SSL_renegotiate
Hello,
I see some delay about 30-40 min for my emails. They arrive and I see them in
the incoming messages in the list only after 30-40 min. And one email was
delivered for 2 hours. Is it normal for the openssl-users@openssl.org?
Some time ago I see an email with message: Welcome to the
Hi, Jakob. Thanks for reply.
Now I have seen OpenSSL code and something clear for me.
WANT_READ/WANT_WRITE it's just an implementation for WOULDBLOCK: not fatal
error for non-blocking IO. So, for example for socket and Windows it's just
WSAEWOULDBLOCK returns by WSAGetLastError. Peforms by
must again call SSL_write()
untill it returns with success?
3. Can be this situation: SSL_write() returns =0 and then SSL_get_error()
returns SSL_ERROR_WANT_WRITE?
What to do in this case for non-blocking socket?
--
Best Regards,
Serj Rakitov
18 matches
Mail list logo