Re: [openssl-users] X25519 not listed in ecparam -list_curves

2016-11-14 Thread Dr. Stephen Henson
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016, Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL wrote: > As "-list-curves" is not supposed to work here, what would be a good way to > tell if a given installation supports X25519? > Well only OpenSSL 1.1.0 currently supports X25519. One way is to look at the output of: openssl

Re: [openssl-users] X25519 not listed in ecparam -list_curves

2016-11-14 Thread Blumenthal, Uri - 0553 - MITLL
o: openssl-users@openssl.org Reply To: openssl-users@openssl.org Subject: Re: [openssl-users] X25519 not listed in ecparam -list_curves ‎ On Fri, Nov 04, 2016, Viktor J?gersk?pper wrote: > Hi, > > OpenSSL 1.1.0 implemented X25519. "openssl s_client -cipher kEECDH > -curves X25

Re: [openssl-users] X25519 not listed in ecparam -list_curves

2016-11-14 Thread Dr. Stephen Henson
On Fri, Nov 04, 2016, Viktor J?gersk?pper wrote: > Hi, > > OpenSSL 1.1.0 implemented X25519. "openssl s_client -cipher kEECDH > -curves X25519 -connect google.com:443" works as expected, and I get > "Server Temp Key: X25519, 253 bits". But X25519 is not listed in the > output of "openssl ecparam

[openssl-users] X25519 not listed in ecparam -list_curves

2016-11-04 Thread Viktor Jägersküpper
Hi, OpenSSL 1.1.0 implemented X25519. "openssl s_client -cipher kEECDH -curves X25519 -connect google.com:443" works as expected, and I get "Server Temp Key: X25519, 253 bits". But X25519 is not listed in the output of "openssl ecparam -list_curves" in version 1.1.0b (I use 1.1.0b-2 from Debian).