On 07/18/2013 10:17 PM, Thomas J. Hruska wrote:
> ...
> I'm not seeing anywhere in the Q&A where it might suggest how much
> funding would be required to meet the financial goals of upgrading
> OpenSSL FIPS. Based on the "as low as" private label price tag of
> $35,000 located elsewhere on the sit
On 7/18/2013 12:14 PM, Steve Marquess wrote:
On 07/18/2013 12:53 PM, Nou Dadoun wrote:
Just as a short comment, our fips/non-fips usage could probably
satisfy this requirement; we wrap openssl in an external api that
routes through a function pointer table. Then at run-time we can
fill in the f
On 07/18/2013 12:53 PM, Nou Dadoun wrote:
> Just as a short comment, our fips/non-fips usage could probably
> satisfy this requirement; we wrap openssl in an external api that
> routes through a function pointer table. Then at run-time we can
> fill in the function pointers with the fips functions
age-
From: Steve Marquess [mailto:marqu...@opensslfoundation.com]
Sent: July 17, 2013 4:55 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Cc: Nou Dadoun
Subject: Re: End of the line for OpenSSL Fips?
On 07/16/2013 08:10 PM, Nou Dadoun wrote:
> Since I hadn't looked for a while, I thought that I'd see
On 07/16/2013 08:10 PM, Nou Dadoun wrote:
> Since I hadn't looked for a while, I thought that I'd see where the
> current Openssl FIPS work stood and found this:
> http://www.opensslfoundation.com/fips/ig95.html
>
> Surprised that I hadn't heard about this previously but if I'm
> reading it corre
Since I hadn't looked for a while, I thought that I'd see where the current
Openssl FIPS work stood and found this:
http://www.opensslfoundation.com/fips/ig95.html
Surprised that I hadn't heard about this previously but if I'm reading it
correctly, it seems to effectively kill any future Openss
