On 04/10/2014 11:36 AM, Jason Todd wrote:
> One other quick question. Is it possible to use the fipscanister from
> 1.0.1c with 1.0.1g and maintain compliance? Assuming that even compiles
fipscanister is not "from" 1.0.1 anything; it is from the OpenSSL FIPS
Object Module 2.0, i.e. one of the open
One other quick question. Is it possible to use the fipscanister from
1.0.1c with 1.0.1g and maintain compliance? Assuming that even compiles
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 9:32 AM, ag@gmail wrote:
> Yes, you are correct.
>
> -ag
>
> --
> sent via 100% recycled electrons from my mobile command center.
Yes, you are correct.
-ag
--
sent via 100% recycled electrons from my mobile command center.
> On Apr 10, 2014, at 5:54 AM, Jason Todd wrote:
>
> Just to verify, heart bleed doesn't look like it effects the fipscanister. I
> can just recompile openssl 1.0.1c with the no heart beat option and
Just to verify, heart bleed doesn't look like it effects the fipscanister.
I can just recompile openssl 1.0.1c with the no heart beat option and my
current canister and still retain FIPS certification.
