Is there a correlation between the strength (size) of the asymmetric keys used
to do the authentication and the strength (size) of the ephemeral DH keys
generated/used to protect the session key (during the key exchange)?
On first glance, in s3_srvr.c, it seems like the tmp_dh_callback
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 12:23 PM, no_spam...@yahoo.com wrote:
Is there a correlation between the strength (size) of the asymmetric keys
used to do the authentication and the strength (size) of the ephemeral DH
keys generated/used to protect the session key (during the key exchange)?
Yes
Thank you for the information and links.
[stuff deleted]
I'm probably missing something in the OpenSSL implementation. The
documentation for SSL_CTX_set_tmp_dh_callback() says that the
tmp_dh_callback is called with the keylength needed... But surely
this can't be only 512 or
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 3:00 PM, no_spam...@yahoo.com wrote:
Thank you for the information and links.
[stuff deleted]
I'm probably missing something in the OpenSSL implementation. The
documentation for SSL_CTX_set_tmp_dh_callback() says that the
tmp_dh_callback is called with the
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012, no_spam...@yahoo.com wrote:
Is there a correlation between the strength (size) of the asymmetric keys
used to do the authentication and the strength (size) of the ephemeral DH
keys generated/used to protect the session key (during the key exchange)?
On first glance
