Re: Subject Alternative Name Help

2010-02-15 Thread Steffen DETTMER
Hi! * Victor Duchovni wrote on Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 15:03 -0500: On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 08:35:09PM +0100, Steffen DETTMER wrote: (So DER encoding is used, and it is allowing 128 byte long length fields allowing 2^1024 [a number taking four and a half line in xterm because 309

Re: Subject Alternative Name Help

2010-02-12 Thread rono16
this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Subject-Alternative-Name-Help-tp27539914p27555907.html Sent from the OpenSSL - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org

Re: Subject Alternative Name Help

2010-02-12 Thread Steffen DETTMER
* Victor Duchovni wrote: The SSL/TLS record layer has a maximum record size, a certificate probably needs to fit into one record, so if your 500+ domains generate a certificate that is larger than ~16K bytes, you may be out of luck. (I just ask for curiosity, not because I have any problem

Re: Subject Alternative Name Help

2010-02-12 Thread rono16
-- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Subject-Alternative-Name-Help-tp27539914p27565135.html Sent from the OpenSSL - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __ OpenSSL Project

Re: Subject Alternative Name Help

2010-02-12 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 12:41:16PM +0100, Steffen DETTMER wrote: * Victor Duchovni wrote: The SSL/TLS record layer has a maximum record size, a certificate probably needs to fit into one record, so if your 500+ domains generate a certificate that is larger than ~16K bytes, you may be out

Re: Subject Alternative Name Help

2010-02-12 Thread Steffen DETTMER
* Victor Duchovni wrote on Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 14:20 -0500: The limit is not (only?) an X.509 limit, rather the SSL/TLS record layer cannot carry messages larger than 2^14 bytes (plus some overhead for compression algorithms which provably need to be able to make some records larger in order

Re: Subject Alternative Name Help

2010-02-12 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 08:35:09PM +0100, Steffen DETTMER wrote: (So DER encoding is used, and it is allowing 128 byte long length fields allowing 2^1024 [a number taking four and a half line in xterm because 309 decimal digits long] bytes long value fields sufficient to enumerate

Subject Alternative Name Help

2010-02-11 Thread rono16
of the sites where the certificate is installed. I've read RFC3280 and there is no mention of a maximum for SAN entries. Has anyone had any experience with this or do you have any ideas? Thanks for any help. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Subject-Alternative-Name-Help

Re: Subject Alternative Name Help

2010-02-11 Thread Victor Duchovni
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 03:23:03PM -0800, rono16 wrote: I am using OpenSSL to create a self sign certificate and have a need to add approximately 4000, yes 4000, DNS entries (don't ask why) using Subject Alternative Name. I have succeeded in creating a certificate with 500 DNS entries and