in school.
Thanks.
Regards,
Lee
-Original Message-
From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org
[mailto:owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of Steffen DETTMER
Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 11:04 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: Thread locking functions
* Sad Clouds wrote on Mon
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:39:51 -0500
Lee Linkoff llink...@unitecelectronics.com wrote:
Can someone please give me some links to some basic tutorials on
locking callbacks. I tried different searches on Google, but no
links to basic tutorials came up. I tried different search criteria.
To
Enviado el: martes, 16 de febrero de 2010 14:04
Para: openssl-users@openssl.org
CC: Lee Linkoff
Asunto: Re: Thread locking functions
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:39:51 -0500
Lee Linkoff llink...@unitecelectronics.com wrote:
Can someone please give me some links to some basic tutorials on
locking callbacks
I didn't read all the email
-Mensaje original-
De: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org]
En nombre de Sad Clouds
Enviado el: martes, 16 de febrero de 2010 14:04
Para: openssl-users@openssl.org
CC: Lee Linkoff
Asunto: Re: Thread locking functions
On Mon
Subject: RE: Thread locking functions
Can someone please give me some links to some basic tutorials on
locking callbacks. I tried different searches on Google, but no links
to basic tutorials came up. I tried different search criteria.
To date, I have never used them on the job and don't recall
Hi, I've recently started looking at OpenSSL programming API and I'm a
bit confused about thread locking funtions:
1. Static VS Dynamic locking callbacks
Why have both? Does OpenSSL use dynamic callbacks? Can I omit static
callbacks and only use dynamic, or maybe static callbacks are mandatory
* Sad Clouds wrote on Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 13:18 +:
2. Rationale for callbacks?
Pushing some of the responsibility for locking OpenSSL internal
structures to application developers seems a bit lame. Why not get rid
of locking callbacks and have OpenSSL handle it transparently inside
the
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:19:23 +0100
Steffen DETTMER steffen.dett...@ingenico.com wrote:
* Sad Clouds wrote on Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 13:18 +:
2. Rationale for callbacks?
Pushing some of the responsibility for locking OpenSSL internal
structures to application developers seems a bit
* Sad Clouds wrote on Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 14:52 +:
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:19:23 +0100
Steffen DETTMER steffen.dett...@ingenico.com wrote:
Delegating functionality via callbacks allows arbitrary
implementations; I would not consider this lame
- but clean, strong, orthogonal, KISS and
Sad Clouds wrote:
I think pretty much every Unix platform standardised on Posix threads
by now. Using locking implies that you're using threads, and that is
Pthreads API on Unix.
Just because you are using threads and on a platform that supports native
threads, it does not follow that you
10 matches
Mail list logo
