On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 13:45:33 + (GMT)
Nathan Smyth wrote:
> Can you use the standard socket functions (i.e. poll/select) on a fd
> for a ssl connection?
> I know you need to use the ssl_read/writes and other functions etc
> to actually 'do stuff', but do the std socket state checking
> funct
On Apr 12, 2014, at 3:08 PM, Michael Tuexen
wrote:
>>
> I have read the rumor. It is wrong.
"Introduced with intent" vs. "known to the NSA" -- two
different things, right?
I don't have any direct knowledge of what goes on in the
NSA, but if they don't have a whole cubicle farm full
of p
On Apr 12, 2014, at 5:40 PM, Michael Tuexen
wrote:
>>
>> "Introduced with intent" vs. "known to the NSA" -- two
>> different things, right?
> My statement was referring to the "Introduced with intend".
Understood. I'm personally quite sure it *wasn't* introduced
with intent, which is why I
Hello thereI've previously sent this to the mod_ssl list with no success. Sorry if you've seen it before:I have apache compiled on solaris with sun cc with mod_ssl-
2.8.25-1.3.34 and openssl-0.9.8a (I've also tried 0.9.7i and the nightly build).When accessing the site using Internet Explorer I hav
OK I have been able to 'fix' this by adding the following directive:
SSLProtocol SSLv2
Does this suggest a buggy SSL v3 implementation in openssl on my platform? Odd that nobody else is experiencing it.
Michael
On 1/31/06, Michael Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello ther
is always better not to use v2.
Did u tried with SSLv23 ..?
Samy
Michael Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
07.02.2006 14:47
Please respond to
openssl-users@openssl.org
To
openssl-users@openssl.org
cc
Subject
Re: Errors with firefox
Classificati
Hi there,
A follow-up to my own post from last week. I've done some more digging - hopefully this is enough for someone to offer some suggestions.
I have been trying different versions of openssl with apache on solaris and sun cc. With versions >= 0.9.7 (see below exact list of releases teste
broken SSL implementations that was found and quashed about aweek ago. If you turn off backward-compatibility (including MSIEbroken SSL implementation), does the problem persist?
-Kyle HOn 2/8/06, Michael Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Hi there,>> A follow-up to my own post from
tephen Henson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:> On Wed, Feb 08, 2006, Michael Smith wrote:>> >> > A follow-up to my own post from last week. I've done some more digging -> > hopefully this is enough for someone to offer some suggestions.
> >> > I have been tryin
e of a zlib
size calculation change.However, the specifics are slightly different between that case and this one.-Kyle HOn 2/8/06, Dr. Stephen Henson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:> On Wed, Feb 08, 2006, Michael Smith wrote:>> >> > A follow-up to my own post from last week. I've
10 matches
Mail list logo
