-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Yuliya Shulman
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2008 9:29 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: RE: Prime number generation on FreeBSD-sparc64
Thank you so much for providing the article and the flags!
It is fine to use OpenSSL as long as the instructions IN that license are
followed, note:
...All advertising materials mentioning features ...
That is pretty broad. Basically, if your commercial application has a
spec sheet or other sheet that is distributed as part of an advertisement
of the
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Patrick Patterson
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 8:04 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: Prime number generation on FreeBSD-sparc64
On July 17, 2008 10:48:51 am Yuliya Shulman wrote:
I'm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Yuliya Shulman
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 7:27 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: RE: Prime number generation on FreeBSD-sparc64
Yes, I understand the list of prime numbers is known;
.
Growl I guess i'm going to have to find an alternative ):
Thanks for your help
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 11:52 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It is fine to use OpenSSL as long as the instructions IN that license
are followed, note:
...All advertising materials
What version of gcc?
Ted
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Yuliya Shulman
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 6:51 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: RE: Prime number generation on FreeBSD-sparc64
I sent this before a few earlier
This is from /openssl-SNAP-20090405 on Solaris x86 ver 2.5.1 using
gcc 2.95.3:
gcc -I.. -I../.. -I../asn1 -I../evp -I../../include -fPIC -DOPENSSL_PIC
-DOPENSSL_THREADS -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -O3
-fomit-frame-pointer -march=pentium -Wall -DL_ENDIAN
-DOPENSSL_NO_INLINE_ASM
prohibit
the end user from informing the copyright holders of OpenSSL
if they created and used a version of OpenSSL with your library
in it.
Ted Mittelstaedt
Author, The FreeBSD Corporate Networker's Guide.
__
OpenSSL Project
- Original Message -
From: Ryan Shon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 12:07 PM
Subject: related license question
Thank you for the clarification. What you have said
makes sense, but I am still a little unclear on what
is meant by
- Original Message -
From: David Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 2:04 PM
Subject: RE: related license question
Thank you for the clarification. What you have said
makes sense, but I am still a little unclear on what
is
- Original Message -
From: David Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 2:17 PM
Subject: RE: license question
What is actually going on when the end-user runs OpenSSL and it
dynamically links in your restricted library, or the end
- Original Message -
From: David Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2006 5:22 AM
Subject: RE: license question
I wholeheartedly disagree. You cannot violate the OpenSSL
license by using
OpenSSL.
The end user is not
- Original Message -
From: Richard Salz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2006 10:04 PM
Subject: Re: license question
There are many funny licensing clauses that appear nonsensical to the
layman but are perfectly logical. The SSLeay and
- Original Message -
From: David Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2006 11:23 PM
Subject: RE: license question
You can start out with an OEM license, load that on another
piece of hardware, then get the holder to sue you. I'd
- Original Message -
From: David Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Sent: Sunday, September 03, 2006 3:39 AM
Subject: RE: license question
These are EULAs. I'm talking about pure copyright licenses like the
OpenSSL, BSD, and GPL licenses. EULAs are
John,
Please provide the openSSL invocations with complete command line options
you are using to generate the certificates. I hope to God you aren't using
some
front end script to run openSSL or we won't ever get anywhere.
Ted
- Original Message -
From: John A. Kilpatrick [EMAIL
- Original Message -
From: David Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Sent: Thursday, December 07, 2006 6:49 PM
Subject: RE: HTTPS security model
OK, I'm going to take a humourous punch at what you just said; if
authentication and authorization are the same
Self-Signed Certificate - Windows Vistaplease post the steps you did to create
the self-signed cert
Ted
- Original Message -
From: Mike Koponick
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 1:09 PM
Subject: Self-Signed Certificate - Windows Vista
Hello,
-in mikek -c.p12 -clcerts -nokeys -info
Thanks!
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted
Mittelstaedt
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2007 12:02 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: Self-Signed Certificate - Windows
Note that Microsoft changed in IE7 the method of adding a self-signed
root CA into the browser store, your users will need to be familiar
with the new procedure if they are running this.
Ted
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of ProgrammerMP
The easiest way is to have the user install a random device. There's ones
out there
for Solaris all the way back to version 2.5.1
However, keep in mind that all but the latest /dev/random devices out there
do
not generate very good random numbers, the newer ones use the Yarrow engine,
but the
Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2008 7:58 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: RE: Handling missing random number generator
Original message
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 03:42:36 -0800
From: Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The easiest way is to have
I thought at one time there was a patch for a gcc version that
also worked around Sun's buggy linker.
Ted
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of A V
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2008 3:30 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: How to
Joel,
Before compiling anything on the Mac you need to read the documents on the
Apple
website that discuss how to setup your environment properly and how to issue
the
correct C compilation commands. Also the make on MacOS X doesen't support
all
of the features that make on some other platforms
Just use FreeBSD 5.X as your operating system, the random device
on it has been completely rewritten to be self-seeding with
high quality random numbers. It harvests from a number of interrupts and
if you don't turn those on it uses the Yarrow PRNG code. And it
also uses the hardware random
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of C Wegrzyn
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 10:14 AM
To: Ken Goldman
Cc: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: Generating a lot of randomness...
I can't add anything beyond what is available on a AMD or Intel
# uname -a
SunOS mail2 5.5.1 Generic_103641-42 i86pc i386 i86pc
# gcc -v
Reading specs from
/usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/i586-sun-solaris2.5.1/2.95.3/specs
gcc version 2.95.3 20010315 (release)
#
Hardware is a Pentium 66. (yes, an original Pentium)
# ./Configure solaris-x86-gcc zlib shared
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of C Wegrzyn
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 4:14 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Cc: Ken Goldman
Subject: Re: Generating a lot of randomness...
Linux (gentoo variant).
C.
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto
OK it's still got a problem:
# ./config
Operating system: i86pc-whatever-solaris2
Configuring for solaris-x86-gcc
Configuring for solaris-x86-gcc
no-gmp [default] OPENSSL_NO_GMP (skip dir)
no-krb5 [krb5-flavor not specified] OPENSSL_NO_KRB5
no-mdc2 [default]
Thanks, Andy! It builds now. And make test completes without errors.
I have another question on this build, config puts in
-march=i486
but, shouldn't we be using
-march=pentium
The reason I ask is I see a lot of files that appear to be
specific for the Pentium or later CPU - will these
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andy Polyakov
Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2005 9:35 AM
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Cc: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: Compilation of openssl-0.9.8-stable-SNAP-20050624 fails on
Solaris 2.5.1 x86
I have
md5 is
not patented.des and 3desthe patent expired. Blowfish
was originally published
not
patented. That's all I know. With Cisco IPSec work just about all
configs use md5, sha,
des
and 3des and Cisco isn't known for liking to pay royalties to anyone. If I
were you I
would
stick with
of summary notes on the SHA-1 developments
at:http://www.rsasecurity.com/rsalabs/
Hope this helps.
Suerte,
_Vin
- in response to -
Ted Mittelstaedt tedm_at_toybox.placo.com wrote:
md5 is not patented. des and 3des the patent
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Michael Sierchio
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 1:26 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: Algorithm licensing
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Actually, regardless of the cipher you use, unless you have
Get a real modem. Your probably using a winmodem which does all
the host processing in the computer CPU. Also, encrypted data isn't very
compressible so you should turn off both ppp and hardware compression.
Many winmodems upchuck when you try to run them with hardware compression
disabled.
What OS?
Ted
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chuck Lidderdale
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 11:27 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: SSL PHP
My test as a cut'n paste right from the php web page.
?php
$connection =
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: SSL PHP
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
What OS?
Ted
Sorry bout that:
RH Linux -
PHP 5.0.4
OpenSSH_3.4p1, SSH protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0x0090602f
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Chuck
Hi All,
OpenSSL builds but fails tests. Here's the particulars:
Freshly installed and patched Solaris 8 x86 system
# gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/local/lib/gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.8/3.4.2/specs
Configured with:
../configure --with-as=/usr/ccs/bin/as --with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld --disabl
e-nls
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Geoff Thorpe
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 9:17 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: Problem with OpenSSL on Solaris x86 *
On October 4, 2005 08:00 am, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
OpenSSL builds but fails tests. Here's the particulars:
[snip
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Victor Duchovni
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 10:06 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: Problem with OpenSSL on Solaris x86 *
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 10:02:07AM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote
How many sessions you thinking of running on each server?
Ted
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bards1888
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2005 3:34 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Speed tests
Hello all,
I've searched the archives
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Schwartz
Sent: Saturday, December 31, 2005 12:05 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: RE: Chicken and egg issue
On 12/31/05, David Schwartz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then I'll just reiterate
You might try installing the GNU binutils and gas instead of the
solaris assembler and linker and see if that helps. People have
had problems before using gcc and feeding the result to the
solaris linker, and in fact there's a patch for gcc mentioned in
the openssl readme or faq or some such.
Build it with assembly language disabled. I wouldn't put it past
Apple to have hashed up the linker in Darwin. Or, better yet, use
the Apple-supplied gcc to bootstrap the latest gcc and binutils,
and build it with that.
Ted
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
Hi Eric,
I hope you leave the license alone.
I have seen increasing examples of GPL code used in embedded products,
and
for all the philosophizing the GPL people do, they roll over when it
comes to suing
people.
Take for example the ActionTec DSL modem, this is sold by ActionTec and
runs
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Schwartz
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 4:41 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: RE: Licenses...
Take for example the ActionTec DSL modem, this is sold by
ActionTec and
runs embedded Linux. It
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tyler MacDonald
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 7:43 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: Licenses...
And as a result, OpenSSL will be used by even more pieces of
software and OpenSSL will
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Christopher Fowler
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 5:23 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: Licenses...
On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 08:07 -0400, Wes Kussmaul wrote:
Are you suggesting that if you embed
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Richard
Levitte - VMS Whacker
Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 11:43 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Licenses...
I've come into this project with the vision that
OpenSSL should
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Schwartz
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 4:10 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: RE: Licenses...
This was the same argument used by the Linux people to get
the University
of California,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tyler MacDonald
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 9:48 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Licenses...
Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I still have not seen from
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kyle Hamilton
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 9:51 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Licenses...
On 4/12/06, Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey I have an idea
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Schwartz
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 7:33 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: RE: Licenses...
I still find this argument incomprehensible. Are you
suggesting that the
sole purpose the
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tyler MacDonald
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 10:45 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Licenses...
Ted Mittelstaedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An end user can download
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kyle Hamilton
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 12:51 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Licenses...
I have an open-source project. It may be compiled with or without
OpenSSL
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Schwartz
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 3:47 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: RE: Licenses...
I still find this argument incomprehensible. Are you
suggesting that the
sole purpose the
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tyler MacDonald
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 10:10 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Licenses...
I'm not saying dependant, I'm saying available!!!
Binary
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kyle Hamilton
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 12:30 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Licenses...
Why not an advertising clause exemption for non-binary (i.e., source)
PROTECTED]
on Fri, 14 Apr 2006 17:28:47 -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
tedm OpenSSL needs to stick with the license that most closely
tedm reflects the philosophy of it's authors. That is, right now, an
tedm advert clause license, that is why the advert clause is in
tedm there. If some
, Ted Mittelstaedt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
tedm If the OpenSSL authors (you included) wanted to change the
tedm license you all would have done so, it's not like you don't have
tedm write access to the source and cannot change it. You could
tedm change it right now if you want. So don't pretend
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David Schwartz
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 1:47 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: RE: Licenses...
No, it is not. There is a problem, and that is why there is a
mechanism IN THE GPL ITSELF to take
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Richard
Levitte - VMS Whacker
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 4:20 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Licenses...
Not at all, I spoke for myself (I do believe I said that clearly
Maybe
creating the library with ld rather than gcc might work
better?
Ted
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On
Behalf Of BorisSent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 2:58
PMTo: openssl-users@openssl.orgSubject: Using libcrypto
in a shared
How about creating a config file that does not have the CN and
emailAddress
fields?
Ted
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Joel
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 6:02 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am working on an cryptographic abstraction layer for Qt,
imaginatively called the Qt Cryptographic Architecture (QCA). One of
the
back-end plugins
that is in development links to OpenSSL. Right now, the
directory name is
qca-openssl. When it gets released, each
65 matches
Mail list logo
