> From: openssl-users On Behalf Of ???
> Sent: Friday, 21 October, 2022 02:39
> Subject: Re: openssl-users Digest, Vol 95, Issue 27
Please note the text in the footer of each openssl-users digest message:
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re:
On Thu, 28 May 2020 13:20:02 +0200,
Johnny Black wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having problems installing openssl.
> I downloaded 1.1.1 version from the website and
> I followed all the instructions but
> when I run the "nmake" command I get an error.
> It says, I quote:
> "ias -d debug -o
Michael Wojcik wrote:
From: tim.j.culh...@gmail.com [mailto:tim.j.culh...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2020 01:25
I ran the gmake and it fails with the below ld errors.
Is this the known issue mentioned previously with building openssl on Sparc
or is it caused by something else?
...
> From: tim.j.culh...@gmail.com [mailto:tim.j.culh...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 07, 2020 01:25
>
> I ran the gmake and it fails with the below ld errors.
>
> Is this the known issue mentioned previously with building openssl on Sparc
> or is it caused by something else?
>
> ...
>
>
]: *** [Makefile:2228: apps/openssl] Error 2
-Original Message-
From: openssl-users On Behalf Of Michael
Wojcik
Sent: Monday 6 April 2020 16:58
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: RE: building openssl 1.1.1 for Solaris 10
> From: tim.j.culh...@gmail.com [mailto:tim.j.culh...@gmail.
> From: tim.j.culh...@gmail.com [mailto:tim.j.culh...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 06, 2020 09:15
>
> I'm using gcc 4.9.2
>
>
> So, should I just ignore that warning and let the gmake continue?
Yes, that's what I would recommend. If it bugs you, you could always experiment
with changing it,
Hi,
I'm using gcc 4.9.2
So, should I just ignore that warning and let the gmake continue?
Tim
-Original Message-
From: openssl-users On Behalf Of Michael
Wojcik
Sent: Monday 6 April 2020 15:31
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: RE: building openssl 1.1.1 for Solaris 10
> F
> From: tim.j.culh...@gmail.com [mailto:tim.j.culh...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 06, 2020 06:35
> To: Michael Wojcik; openssl-users@openssl.org
> Subject: RE: building openssl 1.1.1 for Solaris 10
>
> Ok, attempting to build openssl 1.1.1e now.
>
> As prompted b
-users On Behalf Of Michael
Wojcik
Sent: Friday 3 April 2020 23:17
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: RE: building openssl 1.1.1 for Solaris 10
> From: tim.j.culh...@gmail.com [mailto:tim.j.culh...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 03, 2020 15:21
>
> Just wondering if there is
> From: tim.j.culh...@gmail.com [mailto:tim.j.culh...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 03, 2020 15:21
>
> Just wondering if there is a man page or similar on openssl.org which
> describes the steps.
As I noted before, INSTALL and NOTES.TXT. Those are in the root of the OpenSSL
source
No, not run into that issue.
Just wondering if there is a man page or similar on openssl.org which
describes the steps.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: openssl-users On Behalf Of Michael
Wojcik
Sent: Friday 3 April 2020 19:49
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: RE: building openssl
> From: Quanah Gibson-Mount [mailto:qua...@symas.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 03, 2020 12:06
>
> --On Friday, April 3, 2020 6:31 PM + Michael Wojcik
> wrote:
>
> >> From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf
> >> Of tim.j.culh...@gmail.com
> >> Sent: Friday, April
--On Friday, April 3, 2020 6:31 PM + Michael Wojcik
wrote:
From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf
Of tim.j.culh...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, April 03, 2020 10:49
Are there instructions somewhere for building and installing openssl
1.1.1 from source
> From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of
> tim.j.culh...@gmail.com
> Sent: Friday, April 03, 2020 10:49
>
> Are there instructions somewhere for building and installing openssl 1.1.1
> from source for Solaris 10?
You mean beyond what's in INSTALL and
Hi all,
Glad to report that using the latest 1.1.1 stable build from git, all tests
pass successfully and also my issue with the valgrind issues is resolved.
Many thanks for your prompt help.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Dr. Matthias St. Pierre
Sent: Wednesday 9 October 2019 22:58
:30
To: tim.j.culh...@gmail.com; openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: building OpenSSL 1.1.1 with -DPURIFY
On Wed, 2019-10-09 at 11:37 +0100, tim.j.culh...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've built OpenSSL 1.1.1c locally on my 64 bit CentOS 7 server.
>
> My application links wit
On Wed, 2019-10-09 at 11:37 +0100, tim.j.culh...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've built OpenSSL 1.1.1c locally on my 64 bit CentOS 7 server.
>
> My application links with the libraries contained in this build.
>
> When running tests for my application under valgrind I'm seeing lots
> of
>
Emilia's work removed the need to add -DPURIFY; you never need to add it.
Note that the BN code is clever, it doesn't bother to zero everything when it
knows which bits within a word it is using.
On Wed, 09 Oct 2019 11:37:02 +0100, tim.j.culh...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've built OpenSSL 1.1.1c locally on my 64 bit CentOS 7 server.
>
> My application links with the libraries contained in this build.
>
> When running tests for my application under valgrind I'm seeing lots of
>
On 16/09/2019 16:26, Peter Sui wrote:
> Hi Matt,
> I said " It does not work" means, after I build the open-ssl1.1.1d with
> or without the "enable-deprecated" configuration, then use the library, header
> files in my application as before with the older version(1.0.2t), then my
>
Hi Matt,
I said " It does not work" means, after I build the open-ssl1.1.1d
with or without the "enable-deprecated" configuration, then use the
library, header files in my application as before with the older
version(1.0.2t), then my build failed, the errors are like:
Error C3861
Matt has answered the main question, but as an aside:
-D"_CRT_SECURE_NO_DEPRECATE" suppresses warning messages from Microsoft's
Visual C compiler for using various standard C library functions, rather than
using the optional "secure" ones (a misnomer, as they are at best somewhat
easier to use
On 16/09/2019 16:09, Peter Sui wrote:
> Hi Matt,
> So you are saying configuring with "enable-deprecated" or not won't
> make
> the build different, they are all actually support the deprecated functions,
> right ?
Right.
> If yes, then in my application , if I have
Hi Matt,
So you are saying configuring with "enable-deprecated" or not won't
make the build different, they are all actually support the deprecated
functions, right ? If yes, then in my application , if I have
"OPENSSL_USE_DEPRECATED"
defined, the depecated functions in my application
On 16/09/2019 15:44, Peter Sui wrote:
> Hi,
> From the openssl website, I got the folloeing instruction:
> "
> Access to deprecated functions/macros has been removed by default. To enable
> access you must do two things. 1) Build OpenSSL with deprecation support (pass
>
Hi,
From the openssl website, I got the folloeing instruction:
"
Access to deprecated functions/macros has been removed by default. To
enable access you must do two things. 1) Build OpenSSL with deprecation
support (pass "enable-deprecated" as an argument to config) 2) Applications
must
> From: openssl-users [mailto:openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of
> Osman Zakir
> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2019 13:45
> I tried enabling both MD2 and RC5
Your previous note said "RC5 or MD4". Are you talking about MD2 or MD4?
> but I got linker errors when trying to build:
n behalf of Osman
Zakir
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2019 9:39 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: Building OpenSSL
Okay, I was able to build it and am running the tests now.
How do I know whether to enable RC5 or MD4, though? Which one do I enable?
Sorry if this is a stupi
Okay, I was able to build it and am running the tests now.
How do I know whether to enable RC5 or MD4, though? Which one do I enable?
Sorry if this is a stupid question. And what's "afalg" (in "test_afalf")?
I'd suggest reading the files called 'README' and 'INSTALL' as a start.
Cheers
Richard
"Lewis, Michael L" skrev: (11 juni 2019 18:55:48
CEST)
>Hi,
>
>I'm trying to build OpenSSL for windows (openssl-1.1.1c), I do the
>following steps:
>
>
>1. cd into open ssl directory.
>
>2. Run:
* The issue I have is that I don’t see ‘do_win64a’ within the ‘ms’
directory (I’m following build instructions here:
On Tue, 21 May 2019 03:26:41 +0200,
dengwenbin_0301 wrote:
>
> wdeng@pek-dliu4-u1:~/wenbindfiles/openssl/openssl [master]$ cd obj/
>
> wdeng@pek-dliu4-u1:~/wenbindfiles/openssl/openssl/obj [master]$ ../config
> Operating system: x86_64-whatever-linux2
> Configuring OpenSSL version 3.0.0-dev for
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/52327290/linking-openssl-with-webassembly
Looks very similar...
'target_link_libraries(mainTest crypto) after that it all worked without
warnings.'
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 1:56 AM Richard Levitte wrote:
> The issue isn't with any defined or not so defined
The issue isn't with any defined or not so defined macro, but most
probably rather with how you're loading the library in the 3rd party
code base. Could it be that you're linking with libssl only?
Cheers,
Richard
On Fri, 10 May 2019 22:29:36 +0200,
Sunghyun Park wrote:
>
> Hi, all. Thanks for
Hi, all. Thanks for your help, I could finish compilation to the end.
However, athough I successfully compiled with _no-asm_ options, I found a
problem when loading the compiled library in the 3rd party code base.
When looking into the source code, the definition of some function seems to
require
I realized I made a mistake when I tried that option before.
Now it works great. Thank you! :)
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 10:43 PM Dr Paul Dale wrote:
> Configure with the _no-asm_ option.
>
> It will be a **lot** slower.
>
>
> Pauli
> --
> Dr Paul Dale | Cryptographer | Network Security &
By the way, has anyone worked on a feature or patch to use browser
provided crypto functions (WebCrypto etc.) when compiled to
pseudo-javascript via EmScripten or WebAssembly?
On 10/05/2019 07:43, Dr Paul Dale wrote:
Configure with the _no-asm_ option.
It will be a **lot** slower.
On 10 May
Configure with the _no-asm_ option.
It will be a **lot** slower.
Pauli
--
Dr Paul Dale | Cryptographer | Network Security & Encryption
Phone +61 7 3031 7217
Oracle Australia
> On 10 May 2019, at 3:33 pm, Sunghyun Park wrote:
>
> Nice to meet you all :)
>
> I faced a problem while
Hello,
It works with our custommized cURL code.
I wrote a detailed build instruction for CE.
https://qiita.com/souju/items/94117c024862f57459c3
> It would be good if you created a github PR for this so the changes can be
> considered for inclusion.
Thank you. I post the PR.
On 19/03/2019 07:08, 田中創樹 wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have successfully build OpenSSL 1.1.1b (only libraries, no app) for
> WINCE700-ARMV4I, though I don't do any tests. Here is what I did. I hope
> original sources will be changed so as there is no need to change.
It would be good if you created a
Hello !
Thanks a lot for sharing this! I will try to compile it with our SDK and let
you know if I get any testing results.
Greetings,
Maxime TORRELLI
Embedded Software Engineer
Conduent
Conduent Business Solutions (France)
1 rue Claude Chappe – BP 345
07503 Guilherand Granges Cedex
De :
I would like (need) to get OpenSSL working in the EFI [...]
In the EDK-2, this directory:
edk2/trunk/edk2/CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/*
showd you how to patch, configure, and build OpenSSL in the EDK-2
environment. Also look in some nearby include directories for OpenSSL
headers and
On 06/27/2012 12:13, Alexandru Geana a...@alegen.net wrote:
Hello!
I keep getting an error while trying to build openssl and am hoping
someone
can help me with this.
I am trying to build on windows with VC++ and the steps that I take
are as
follows:
1) perl Configure VC-WIN32
Of Mounir IDRASSI [mounir.idra...@idrix.net]
Sent: Friday, December 24, 2010 2:51 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: Building OpenSSL vs Downloaded
Hi,
Use IMPLIB on the OpenSSL Dlls (e.g implib.exe -a libeay32.lib
libeay32.dll) in order to create OMF export libraries instead
This is oppressive to women and girls, you should be imprisoned.
--- On Sun, 12/26/10, Ryan Pfeifle r...@vpi-corp.com wrote:
From: Ryan Pfeifle r...@vpi-corp.com
Subject: RE: Building OpenSSL vs Downloaded
To: openssl-users@openssl.org openssl-users@openssl.org
Date: Sunday, December 26
@openssl.org
Sent: Wed, Dec 22, 2010 4:21 pm
Subject: RE: Building OpenSSL vs Downloaded
I use the precompiled DLLs provided by
http://www.slproweb.com/products/Win32OpenSSL.html. I do not
recompile OpenSSL myself, though I do have the source code installed
for reference.
Ryan Pfeifle
Sr
Subject: RE: Building OpenSSL vs Downloaded
You do not need to build the library unless you want to customize it. If you do compile it, it can be used with other compilers. I use the downloaded version with Borland C++Builder 5 and 6, though it was originally built with VC++, and it works
-784-7646 (863-7646)
From: hpenaguz...@aim.com
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Date: 12/22/2010 01:55 PM
Subject:Re: Building OpenSSL vs Downloaded
Sent by:owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org
May I ask which download version are you using?, I tried several and
couldn't build
You do not need to build the library unless you want to customize it. If you
do compile it, it can be used with other compilers. I use the downloaded
version with Borland C++Builder 5 and 6, though it was originally built with
VC++, and it works fine.
Ryan Pfeifle
Sr. Programmer
Voice
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 11:18 PM, Turner, Joe (DIJM)
joe.tur...@smithsdetection.com wrote:
I am working on compiling the fips canister on windows 7 x64 with VS 2010
professional. When I run ms\do_fips- there are two issues.
The first is on line 130 of do_fips.bat. the line should read ml64
to be a workaround
http://www.mail-archive.com/openssl-...@openssl.org/msg24078.html
Maybe thats gonna solve the problems.
Markus
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 20:07:49 +0200
Von: Dr. Stephen Henson st...@openssl.org
An: openssl-users@openssl.org
Betreff: Re: Building
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010, Markus Hofer wrote:
Hi guys
Sorry for the double posts earlier on. I am still trying to build openssl as
small as possible. Therefore I want to build openssl without RSA,DSA and DH
support.( I am working on that for some days now). U
However I have some
On 21-07-2010 21:50, Bryan wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 13:19, Jakob Bohmjb-open...@wisemo.com wrote:
On 21-07-2010 18:26, Bryan wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:33, Jakob Bohmjb-open...@wisemo.comwrote:
On 19-07-2010 16:18, Bryan wrote:
I am trying to build openssl 0.9.8o with
I have built several versions of openssh (through 5.5p1) together with then
current openssl releases, but not in FIPS mode using cygwin. The releases all
were built without any issues. For installation in Windows I started with the
opensshd.exe from the openssh.org site and updated the openssh
On 21-07-2010 16:18, Bryan wrote:
I am trying to build openssl 0.9.8o with the fips-1.2 source. I'm
building it using cygwin as the interface, since I am trying to script
this into an installation process.
When building with Visual Studio, you are better off using a perl
version itself
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:33, Jakob Bohm jb-open...@wisemo.com wrote:
On 21-07-2010 16:18, Bryan wrote:
I am trying to build openssl 0.9.8o with the fips-1.2 source. I'm
building it using cygwin as the interface, since I am trying to script
this into an installation process.
When building
On 21-07-2010 18:26, Bryan wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:33, Jakob Bohmjb-open...@wisemo.com wrote:
On 21-07-2010 16:18, Bryan wrote:
I am trying to build openssl 0.9.8o with the fips-1.2 source. I'm
building it using cygwin as the interface, since I am trying to script
this into an
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 13:19, Jakob Bohm jb-open...@wisemo.com wrote:
On 21-07-2010 18:26, Bryan wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:33, Jakob Bohmjb-open...@wisemo.com wrote:
On 19-07-2010 16:18, Bryan wrote:
I am trying to build openssl 0.9.8o with the fips-1.2 source. I'm
building it
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010, Bryan wrote:
Well, the good thing is I am building this on an XP machine inside a
VM, and I created a snapshot before I started all this, so backing out
is an option to be able to start over and configure the environment
correctly. This might even be what I have to
PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: building OpenSSL 0.9.8/1.0.0 on Solarisx86
Alona Rossen wrote:
Specifyng solaris64-x86_64-gcc as a target results in a 64-bit
library,
while we need a 32-bit library.
Oh, sorry i missed that.
I also failed to create a 32-bit library. It so happened
-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: building OpenSSL 0.9.8/1.0.0 on Solarisx86
Alona Rossen wrote:
Specifyng solaris64-x86_64-gcc as a target results in a 64-bit
library,
while we need a 32-bit library.
Oh, sorry i missed that.
I also failed to create a 32-bit library. It so happened
Alona Rossen wrote:
Hello,
I built 32-bit OpenSSL 0.9.8 and OpenSSL 1.0.0 on Solaris10x86_64
(64-bit kernel on Intel) with gcc compiler. Makefiles were generated
with the following command:
“Configure solaris-x86-gcc”
Try solaris64-x86_64-gcc as the target, which was the default
@openssl.org
Subject: Re: building OpenSSL 0.9.8/1.0.0 on Solarisx86
Alona Rossen wrote:
Hello,
I built 32-bit OpenSSL 0.9.8 and OpenSSL 1.0.0 on Solaris10x86_64
(64-bit kernel on Intel) with gcc compiler. Makefiles were generated
with the following command:
Configure solaris-x86-gcc
easily.
dave
-Original Message-
From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org
[mailto:owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of Dr. David Kirkby
Sent: April 23, 2010 1:33 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: building OpenSSL 0.9.8/1.0.0 on Solarisx86
Alona Rossen wrote:
Hello
We can give an access to our system. How can we contact a developer?
-Original Message-
From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org
[mailto:owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org] On Behalf Of Dr. David Kirkby
Sent: April 23, 2010 3:13 PM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: building OpenSSL
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009, Vadym Stetsiak wrote:
Hi, All
When building OpenSSL library under Win32 I've encountered and error
C2220: warning treated as error - no object file generated
After removing compiler flag /WX from ntdll.mak - build completed
I was building using Visual C++ 9.0
What arguments are you passing to the Configure script? The normal cause of
this is the use of backslashes in pathnames. These weren't escaped properly
and you needed to use slashes instead. The latest snapshots should fix
this.
Steve.
--
Dr Stephen N. Henson. OpenSSL project core
On 2009.03.18 at 14:08:24 +0300, mb0 wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to build openssl-0.9.8j using MinGW compiler on WindowsXP 32bit.
use command:
ms\mingw32
During build process ssleay32.dll is not created.
Only libeay32, libssl32
BUT if build using Visual Studio, all 3 dll libraries are
I'm trying to build OpenSSL with least support for crypto
algorithms expt the cases where they are really needed for it to work .
My sole purpose of all this is to reduce the memory footprint of the
application that uses OpenSSL.. All I want is the procedure to do
so on a WIN32 platform ??
I add the flags no-md2 no-ripemd160 no-bf no-camellia no-cast no-idea
no-mdc2 no-rc5
Bill
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of vaibhav bindroo
Sent: May 8, 2008 1:17 AM
To: openssl-users@openssl.org
Subject: Re: Building OpenSSL
Thanks for the response . I tried out various flags and finally ended up
striping it to arnd 500 KB which seems ok for my application requirements .
Lets see whether it is feasible enough to be portable across various
platforms in immediate future .
Thanks
~Vaibhav Bindroo
The application I am developing requires HTTP over SSL connection
and hence I am using OpenSSL for SSL support . But Using OpenSSL
with all the cryptographic libraries included increases the size of
my app heavily . To deal with that , I want to build a OpenSSL
library with NULL encryption (
Hello,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 05/07/2008 12:51:21 PM:
The application I am developing requires HTTP over SSL connection
and hence I am using OpenSSL for SSL support . But Using OpenSSL
with all the cryptographic libraries included increases the size of
my app heavily . To deal with
Hi ,
Thanks for the quick reply from your side . I understand and respect your
opinion regarding OpenSSL usage .But I need to strip the Openssl library to
the bare minimum for my own use with the app as I wil be using my own
crypto library .
I wanted to ask how can I do it , which linker flags
Thanks for the quick reply from your side . I understand and respect
your opinion regarding OpenSSL usage .But I need to strip the Openssl
library to the bare minimum for my own use with the app as I wil be
using my own crypto library .
So is your question really how can I plug my own
Hi,
I'm trying to build OpenSSL with least support for crypto algorithms expt
the cases where they are really needed for it to work . My sole purpose of
all this is to reduce the memory footprint of the application that uses
OpenSSL.. All I want is the procedure to do so on a WIN32 platform ??
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 04 Nov 2007 10:43:21 +0100, Erik
Leunissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
e.leunissen This is what CHANGES (0.9.8g) says about how to build
e.leunissen openssl outside the source tree:
e.leunissen
e.leunissen *) Add appropriate support for separate
Richard Levitte wrote:
You're thinking of configuration scripts generated using auto* tools.
OpenSSL isn't one of those.
I confess that I did, but at the same time I question whether it matters
very much. As long as the Makefile is generated by *a* configure script,
such a script could
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Sun, 04 Nov 2007 20:29:28 +0100, Erik
Leunissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
e.leunissen As long as the Makefile is generated by *a* configure
e.leunissen script, such a script could provide for remote builds,
e.leunissen regardless whether the configure script
Edward,
You have to add /Zi flag to the d32dll.mak file
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/958x11bc(VS.80).aspx
http://www.grandville.net/pmwiki.php/OpenSSL/Openssl-compilation-windows
Best regards,
Arnaud
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to port openssl to ecos.
As I replied, I did a port of OpenSSL 0.9.7g to eCos. Here is the patch,
with short installation instructions.
You will need a number of eCos packages. Since I also configured for
JFFS2, it's not so easy to see which packages
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to port openssl to ecos. I have downloaded openssl and trying to
build. I get #error not defined. What do I need to do in order to configure
and build open ssl? Also what is the fips download?
I did a port of OpenSSL 0.9.7g to our eCos implementation; we
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006, Hellstern, Thomas (LfSt) wrote:
Hi,
I tried to build OpenSSL-fips-1.0 on Windows XP.
So I followed the install.w32-instructions:
Since you are using the FIPS distribution I'm assuming you want the FIPS
validated module and a version of OpenSSL linked against it.
A littel more info... The shared install fails with the following:
installing 4758cca
cp: lib4758cca.so: No such file or directory
installing aep
cp: libaep.so: No such file or directory
installing atalla
cp: libatalla.so: No such file or directory
installing cswift
cp: libcswift.so: No such
Hello Josh,
The problem I suspect is AES_cbc_encrypt function is defined in aes_cbc.c and that is not compiled and added to the libcrypto library.
You can either edit the openssl-0.9.8a/Makefile
Line 92:
Before : AES_ASM_OBJ= aes-ia64.o
After : AES_ASM_OBJ= aes_core.o aes_cbc.o aes-ia64.o
or
@openssl.orgSubject: Re: Building
OpenSSL 0.9.89a
Hello Josh,
The problem I suspect is AES_cbc_encrypt function is
defined in aes_cbc.c and that is not compiled and added to
the libcrypto library.
You can either edit the openssl-0.9.8a/Makefile
Line 92:
Before : AES_ASM_OBJ
Hi,
Thanks for ur reply colin...
I had perl binaries installed in usr/bin...
actually its not in clearcase structure but when i configure its taking the path of the perl binary which is /usr/bin..
Do we need to have that binary in clearcase structure also..
Thanks,
Haritha.
On 9/19/05, Colin
One would hope not but I've seen cases where hackish solutions like that
are required. I couldn't really say if that's the issue here without
some testing and I'm actually thrilled to say I don't have a clearcase
installation I'm forced to deal with these days.
-- Colin
Haritha Kalluri
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005, Thomas Laramee wrote:
Greetings:
i was able to build openssl for WinXP using essentially
the instructions in the INSTALL.W32 file, except for
one [big] addition.
[snip]
is this a common problem? if not, then perhaps the mistake
is mine?
I just checked
i read the instructions very carefully when i began
(INSTALL.W32), and upon reading your response, i
began anew (with a newly un-tarred set of files),
documented exactly what i typed, and got the
same results. i got the same set of 5 link errors.
my notes are at the bottom of this email.
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005, Thomas Laramee wrote:
i read the instructions very carefully when i began
(INSTALL.W32), and upon reading your response, i
began anew (with a newly un-tarred set of files),
documented exactly what i typed, and got the
same results. i got the same set of 5 link
Hi,
You should have a look at the product HP-UX
Internet Express at :
http://www.software.hp.com/portal/swdepot/displayProductInfo.do?productNumber=HPUXIEXP
This package contains many open source programs like openssl.
Now, it may be packaged with the sources and the "configure"
Hey dude, built ok here, after some tweaks to my server code, all is sweet,
send you the SSLeay binaries if u like...
Pj.
- Original Message -
From: Thomas J. Hruska [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 2:12 AM
Subject: Re: Building openssl on Win2K
At 11:09 AM 10/31/2002 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writeth:
Okay, I give up.
I followed the build instructions in INSTALL.W32 for VC++ only to find an
unparseable makefile (ntdll.mak) with carriage returns embedded in the
names of two macros (e.g. SSL^MOBJ=$(OBJ_D)\ssl.obj ...).
When I fixed
I did it, and without any problem worth
mentioning.
Your troubles might be with two things,
though.
One might be the perl configure .. that is needed
to set up the makefile, there is mention of a specific perl distro req'd, I just
ran it with the one I had, and it worked fine (could be the
: Building openssl on
Win2K
I did it, and without any problem worth
mentioning.
Your troubles might be with two things,
though.
One might be the perl configure .. that is needed
to set up the makefile, there is mention of a specific perl distro req'd, I
just ran it with the one I
openssl under cygwin. No problems at all with
ActiveState perl in an NT DOS prompt.
--Noel
- Original Message -
From: Gait Boxman
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 12:45 PM
Subject: Re: Building openssl on Win2K
I did it, and without any
make ran without a hitch.
-Nick
-Original Message-
From: Tim Regovich - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:+openssl+nburkitt+222c6d3499.tregovich#yahoo.com;spamgourmet.com
]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 2:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Building openssl on Win2K (openssl
Sean O'Riordain wrote:
Hi Bernhard,
Could I suggest that you upgrade your version of gcc, since according to
http://gcc.gnu.org/releases.html#timeline
version 2.6.3 dates back to November 30, 1994 which in our industry is
Hi,
surely upgrading gcc to 2.95.3 or 3.0.4 would be a good shot.
Hi Bernhard,
Could I suggest that you upgrade your version of gcc, since according to
http://gcc.gnu.org/releases.html#timeline
version 2.6.3 dates back to November 30, 1994 which in our industry is
very old indeed! I'm not familiar with hp-ux, but no doubt you should
be able to get your
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
