Tan Eng Ten wrote:
This is another example of the problem I highlighted a few days ago. You
need to be very careful with which getter methods return a new instance
(or inc the ref count), and which ones do not.
Definitely not a bug but a matter of consistency.
it's certainly a bug but it
On Thu, Jul 28, 2005, Nils Larsch wrote:
Tan Eng Ten wrote:
This is another example of the problem I highlighted a few days ago. You
need to be very careful with which getter methods return a new instance
(or inc the ref count), and which ones do not.
Definitely not a bug but a matter of
On Wed, Jul 27, 2005, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to build a PKCS7 envelopped data (encrypted) but when I'm
done withe the PKCS7 structure and I try to free it (calling PKCS7_free)
I keep getting an access violation accessing 0xfeeefef6.
I'm using openssl 0.9.8 under
Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
Any reason you can't use PKCS7_encrypt() instead?
Unfortunately, I got the same result using PKCS7_encrypt().
--
Alexandre Belloni
__
OpenSSL Project
Alexandre Belloni wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to build a PKCS7 envelopped data (encrypted) but when I'm
done withe the PKCS7 structure and I try to free it (calling PKCS7_free)
I keep getting an access violation accessing 0xfeeefef6.
I'm using openssl 0.9.8 under windows XP (win32).
Code is
This is another example of the problem I highlighted a few days ago. You
need to be very careful with which getter methods return a new instance
(or inc the ref count), and which ones do not.
Definitely not a bug but a matter of consistency.
Nils Larsch wrote:
Alexandre Belloni wrote:
Hi,
