Re: the nature of the heartbeat issue (was Re: OpenSSL Security Advisory)

2014-04-14 Thread Matthias Apitz
some nice pictures how the bug works: http://www.xkcd.com/1354/ HIH matthias -- Sent from my FreeBSD netbook Matthias Apitz, g...@unixarea.de, http://www.unixarea.de/ f: +49-170-4527211 UNIX since V7 on PDP-11, UNIX on mainframe since ESER 1055 (IBM /370) UNIX on x86 since SVR4.2

Re: the nature of the heartbeat issue (was Re: OpenSSL Security Advisory)

2014-04-12 Thread Michael Tuexen
On 12 Apr 2014, at 17:43, Matthias Apitz g...@unixarea.de wrote: El día Wednesday, April 09, 2014 a las 01:05:22AM -0700, monloi perez escribió: True. Thanks for the quick reply. On Wednesday, April 9, 2014 3:33 PM, Alan Buxey a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk wrote:

Re: the nature of the heartbeat issue (was Re: OpenSSL Security Advisory)

2014-04-12 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Saturday, April 12, 2014 a las 09:08:15PM +0200, Michael Tuexen escribió: What is the exact bug, can someone show a svn/git diff of the first source version having the bug? http://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commit;h=4817504d069b4c5082161b02a22116ad75f822b1 Hi, Thanks

Re: the nature of the heartbeat issue (was Re: OpenSSL Security Advisory)

2014-04-12 Thread Michael Tuexen
On 12 Apr 2014, at 21:30, Matthias Apitz g...@unixarea.de wrote: El día Saturday, April 12, 2014 a las 09:08:15PM +0200, Michael Tuexen escribió: What is the exact bug, can someone show a svn/git diff of the first source version having the bug?

Re: the nature of the heartbeat issue (was Re: OpenSSL Security Advisory)

2014-04-12 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Saturday, April 12, 2014 a las 09:30:22PM +0200, Matthias Apitz escribió: El día Saturday, April 12, 2014 a las 09:08:15PM +0200, Michael Tuexen escribió: What is the exact bug, can someone show a svn/git diff of the first source version having the bug?

Re: the nature of the heartbeat issue (was Re: OpenSSL Security Advisory)

2014-04-12 Thread Michael Smith
On Apr 12, 2014, at 3:08 PM, Michael Tuexen michael.tue...@lurchi.franken.de wrote: I have read the rumor. It is wrong. Introduced with intent vs. known to the NSA -- two different things, right? I don't have any direct knowledge of what goes on in the NSA, but if they don't have a

Re: the nature of the heartbeat issue (was Re: OpenSSL Security Advisory)

2014-04-12 Thread Jan Danielsson
On 12/04/14 21:30, Matthias Apitz wrote: http://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git;a=commit;h=4817504d069b4c5082161b02a22116ad75f822b1 Thanks for the git diff (and the other statements). Could you please be so kind and point to the exact place of the offending statement (or missing

Re: the nature of the heartbeat issue (was Re: OpenSSL Security Advisory)

2014-04-12 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Saturday, April 12, 2014 a las 03:43:29PM -0400, Michael Smith escribió: On Apr 12, 2014, at 3:08 PM, Michael Tuexen michael.tue...@lurchi.franken.de wrote: I have read the rumor. It is wrong. Introduced with intent vs. known to the NSA -- two different things, right?

Re: the nature of the heartbeat issue (was Re: OpenSSL Security Advisory)

2014-04-12 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Saturday, April 12, 2014 a las 03:43:29PM -0400, Michael Smith escribió: On Apr 12, 2014, at 3:08 PM, Michael Tuexen michael.tue...@lurchi.franken.de wrote: I have read the rumor. It is wrong. Introduced with intent vs. known to the NSA -- two different things, right?

Re: the nature of the heartbeat issue (was Re: OpenSSL Security Advisory)

2014-04-12 Thread Michael Tuexen
On 12 Apr 2014, at 21:43, Michael Smith m...@smithbowen.net wrote: On Apr 12, 2014, at 3:08 PM, Michael Tuexen michael.tue...@lurchi.franken.de wrote: I have read the rumor. It is wrong. Introduced with intent vs. known to the NSA -- two different things, right? My statement was

Re: the nature of the heartbeat issue (was Re: OpenSSL Security Advisory)

2014-04-12 Thread Michael Smith
On Apr 12, 2014, at 5:40 PM, Michael Tuexen michael.tue...@lurchi.franken.de wrote: Introduced with intent vs. known to the NSA -- two different things, right? My statement was referring to the Introduced with intend. Understood. I'm personally quite sure it *wasn't* introduced with