Re: [Openstack] [Ceilometer] Ganglia Ceilometer integration

2013-01-10 Thread Jiang, Yunhong
-Original Message- From: shengjie_...@dell.com [mailto:shengjie_...@dell.com] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 1:38 AM To: Jiang, Yunhong Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net Subject: RE: [Openstack] [Ceilometer] Ganglia Ceilometer integration If Ganglia has interest in ceilometer

Re: [Openstack] [Ceilometer] Ganglia Ceilometer integration

2013-01-08 Thread Jiang, Yunhong
My 2 cents. Basically there are two method to interact with Ganglia. One is to push all data from ceilometer into Gangalia, another one is your suggestion, put all data from Gangalia to ceilometer. According to current definition of ceilometer infrastructure to collect measurements within

Re: [Openstack] Getting Trusted Compute Pools working in Open Stack Folsom

2012-11-22 Thread Jiang, Yunhong
I think trusted_filter is not in the scheduler_default_filters, so you have to make sure it's used by the filter scheduler. Thanks --jyh From: openstack-bounces+yunhong.jiang=intel@lists.launchpad.net [mailto:openstack-bounces+yunhong.jiang=intel@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of

Re: [Openstack] [ceilometer] Hbase storage backend for Ceilometer - blueprint?

2012-11-15 Thread Jiang, Yunhong
Do you plan to implement it? Per my understanding, If yes, then begin implementation, and don't forget to add something like for bp in your patch. Otherwise, wait someone who has interests to work on it :) Thanks --jyh -Original Message- From:

Re: [Openstack] One potential issue on the normalize_time() in timeutils

2012-09-10 Thread Jiang, Yunhong
:25 AM To: Jiang, Yunhong Cc: egl...@redhat.com; openstack@lists.launchpad.net Subject: Re: [Openstack] One potential issue on the normalize_time() in timeutils On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 3:09 AM, Jiang, Yunhong yunhong.ji...@intel.com wrote: Hi, Eoghan and all, When I

Re: [Openstack] One potential issue on the normalize_time() in timeutils

2012-09-10 Thread Jiang, Yunhong
Eoghan, thanks for you comments. I will change it to openstack-common. --jyh -Original Message- From: Eoghan Glynn [mailto:egl...@redhat.com] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 10:33 PM To: Jiang, Yunhong Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net; Robert Collins Subject: Re: [Openstack] One

Re: [Openstack] [Nova] Instance Type Extra Specs clarifications

2012-09-09 Thread Jiang, Yunhong
--jyh From: Vinay Bannai [mailto:vban...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2012 6:26 AM To: Jiang, Yunhong Cc: Dugger, Donald D; Patrick Petit; openstack@lists.launchpad.net (openstack@lists.launchpad.net) Subject: Re: [Openstack] [Nova] Instance Type Extra Specs clarifications Sorry Yunhong

[Openstack] One potential issue on the normalize_time() in timeutils

2012-09-09 Thread Jiang, Yunhong
Hi, Eoghan and all, When I implement an enhancement to trusted_filter, I need utilize timeutils() to parse ISO time. However, I suspect there is one potential issue in normalize_time() and want to get some input from your side. In normalize_time(), if the parameter timestamp

Re: [Openstack] One potential issue on the normalize_time() in timeutils

2012-09-09 Thread Jiang, Yunhong
- From: Robert Collins [mailto:robe...@robertcollins.net] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 3:25 AM To: Jiang, Yunhong Cc: egl...@redhat.com; openstack@lists.launchpad.net Subject: Re: [Openstack] One potential issue on the normalize_time() in timeutils On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 3:09 AM

Re: [Openstack] [Nova] Instance Type Extra Specs clarifications

2012-09-09 Thread Jiang, Yunhong
='and_(' 'InstanceTypeExtraSpecs.instance_type_id == InstanceTypes.id,' 'InstanceTypeExtraSpecs.deleted == False)') Thanks --jyh From: Vinay Bannai [mailto:vban...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 6:56 AM To: Jiang, Yunhong Cc: Dugger, Donald D; Patrick

Re: [Openstack] [Nova] Instance Type Extra Specs clarifications

2012-09-08 Thread Jiang, Yunhong
). Thanks --jyh From: Dugger, Donald D Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2012 4:28 AM To: Vinay Bannai; Patrick Petit; Jiang, Yunhong Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net (openstack@lists.launchpad.net) Subject: RE: [Openstack] [Nova] Instance Type Extra Specs clarifications Well, Yunhong added the API to allow

Re: [Openstack] [Nova] Instance Type Extra Specs clarifications

2012-09-08 Thread Jiang, Yunhong
; Jiang, Yunhong; openstack@lists.launchpad.net (openstack@lists.launchpad.net) Subject: RE: [Openstack] [Nova] Instance Type Extra Specs clarifications OS-FLV-EXTRA-DATA: Do you really need a 17 character scope? Your current scope (I assume it's a derivative of OpenStack Flavor Extra Data

[Openstack] Support flavor extra specs in nova client

2012-08-07 Thread Jiang, Yunhong
Currently the python-novaclient have no operation to set/unset the flavor extra specs. I upload a patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/10768/ to add the support to nova client, can anyone have a review to it? Thanks --jyh ___ Mailing list:

[Openstack] python novaclient's response when extension is disabled

2012-08-01 Thread Jiang, Yunhong
Currently, if an extension is disabled, there will be no clear information like extension is not support, instead, it will return ERROR: n/a (HTTP 404), like followed output in my devstack. yjiang5@yjiang5-linux1:~/work/openstack/devstack$ nova hypervisor-list ERROR: n/a (HTTP 404) I'm not

Re: [Openstack] python novaclient's response when extension is disabled

2012-08-01 Thread Jiang, Yunhong
:16 AM To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net Subject: Re: [Openstack] python novaclient's response when extension is disabled On 08/01/2012 10:10 AM, Jiang, Yunhong wrote: Currently, if an extension is disabled, there will be no clear information like extension is not support, instead

[Openstack] The flavor_id and instance type id for flavor extra spec

2012-07-31 Thread Jiang, Yunhong
Hi, all When I'm trying to add support to python nova-client to list/update flavor extra specs, I noticed that the flavor extra_specs API extension use the flavor ID to access database API, while the corresponding parameter should be instance_type id. I create a bug for it at

Re: [Openstack] One question on the compute_filter

2012-07-17 Thread Jiang, Yunhong
-Original Message- From: Jim Fehlig [mailto:jfeh...@suse.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 11:37 AM To: Jiang, Yunhong Cc: j...@isi.edu; openstack@lists.launchpad.net Subject: Re: [Openstack] One question on the compute_filter Jiang, Yunhong wrote: Hi, Joseph I’m

Re: [Openstack] One question on the compute_filter

2012-07-17 Thread Jiang, Yunhong
-Original Message- From: Joseph Suh [mailto:j...@isi.edu] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 9:38 PM To: Jiang, Yunhong Cc: Dugger, Donald D; openstack@lists.launchpad.net Subject: Re: One question on the compute_filter Yunhong, Thanks for your interest in our patch. The original

[Openstack] One question on the compute_filter

2012-07-16 Thread Jiang, Yunhong
Hi, Joseph I'm working on the patch for blueprints https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/update-flavor-key-value, to add/delete the extra_specs for flavor through nova-manage. I'm still setting up my environment to push the patch. However, when I was testing my patch, I