Strongly disagree, but nicely, of course :)
I'll disagree by showing you an example of why not having a queryable
org model is problematic:
Let's say we go ahead and do what Glen suggests and have a string
account ID that is then attached to the user in a one to many
relationship.
In SQL (MySQL
+1 !!
- Chris
On Feb 6, 2011, at 6:57 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
Strongly disagree, but nicely, of course :)
I'll disagree by showing you an example of why not having a queryable
org model is problematic:
Let's say we go ahead and do what Glen suggests and have a string
You can count on me to participate as a student, looking forward to
contribute to Openstack in GSoC ;-) .
Ricky
2011/2/5 Eric Day e...@oddments.org:
Having been a mentor before for other projects, I strongly agree
that we should do this. It's a great way to get more folks involved
in the
I disagree with your disagreement. :)
When we have string based ID's like this, it doesn't need to translate
directly into a varchar column for operations. First, auth data may not
be stored as SQL at all for some systems and could be broken out into
key/value pairs with some indexed. It could
4 matches
Mail list logo