Hello everyone,
Our weekly team meeting will take place at 21:00 UTC this Tuesday in
#openstack-meeting on IRC.
Check out how that time translates for *your* timezone:
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20110510T21
See the meeting agenda, edit the wiki to add new topics
Diego:
Thank you for tell me this information.
I download the ISO file and burn to CD disk, also use the CD disk
success install into my PC, I can login to the system use
root/stackops as username/password.
I read the docs on
Hi Rick,
Wednesday 22:00 UTC would be fine for me.
Salvatore
-Original Message-
From: Rick Clark [mailto:r...@openstack.org]
Sent: 10 May 2011 10:12
To: Josh Wilmes
Cc: Dan Wendlandt; James Urquhart; Erik Carlin; Salvatore Orlando;
radur...@cisco.com; Ewan Mellor; Youcef Laribi;
On 05/10/2011 04:05 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Hello everyone,
Our weekly team meeting will take place at 21:00 UTC this Tuesday in
#openstack-meeting on IRC.
Each weeks, it's at that time. Here, that makes it 5am, and I don't
really wana wake up just to chat on IRC, but still would like to
Hi,
Is there any progress on KVM block migration?
I'd like to test it and possibly make some changes to nova to support block
devices,
but don't want to reinventing the wheel.
Thanks,
2011/4/12 Masanori ITOH itou...@nttdata.co.jp
Hi,
Vish also mentioned that we should support the KVM block
Hello Vish.
I would like to support testing effort.
I wrote an example very basic unit test doc and some tips how to use
pudb and nose-pudb.
http://etherpad.openstack.org/diablo-testing
Regards
Nachi Ueno NTT
___
Mailing list:
Works for me .
-Original Message-
From: openstack-bounces+dedutta=cisco@lists.launchpad.net
[mailto:openstack-bounces+dedutta=cisco@lists.launchpad.net] On
Behalf Of Rick Clark
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 2:12 AM
To: Josh Wilmes (jwilmes)
Cc: Jamey Meredith; Lew Tucker
Fine by me.
-Original Message-
From: openstack-bounces+alex=mellanox@lists.launchpad.net
[mailto:openstack-bounces+alex=mellanox@lists.launchpad.net] On
Behalf Of Salvatore Orlando
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 5:13 AM
To: Rick Clark; Josh Wilmes
Cc: Jamey Meredith; LewTucker
Vish, this is good stuff. We should pick this up in glance and swift, either
sharing a common effort with nova or specifying for each project the same
documentation that Vish is suggesting.
Heads up for other projects that are looking to be affiliated or incubated
projects, it will save time
It would be better for me, actually.
James Urquhart
Market Manager, SPSU
Cisco Systems, Inc.
w: 408 525 4741
c: 510 908 1224
Sent from my Windows Phone
-Original Message-
From: Rick Clark
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 2:11 AM
To: Josh Wilmes
Cc: Dan Wendlandt; James Urquhart; Erik Carlin;
On May 10, 2011, at 11:07 AM, Matt Dietz wrote:
Alright, I'll buy it. Simply adding a UUID would be trivial
Cool.
Regarding categories, I tend to agree with Jay on this. I think it would
be treacherous to try to account for any number of possibilities, and I
also think that we need to keep
George,
Unless I'm completely mistaken, I think our proposal satisfies this suggestion.
What you have here looks like a slight variation on PSHB. Our stuff is coded
such that the responsibility of any heavy lifting falls outside of Nova. In our
case, we'll be implementing the PubSub publisher
These all sound perfect to me. I'm hoping our PSHB implementation solves that
problem. More specifically, the publisher worker that I linked to earlier I
think solves most of what you're referring to, and works well with the Google
reference hub. There's a lot more work to be done, but I think
I don't know if anyone has started work on this feature. Someone should file a
blueprint.
Vish
On May 10, 2011, at 3:35 AM, Mikhail Shcherbakov wrote:
Hi,
Is there any progress on KVM block migration?
I'd like to test it and possibly make some changes to nova to support block
devices,
Hi George,
Understood, but burrow can act as both. At the core, the difference
between SQS and SNS are notification workers and a lower default
message TTL. Matt mentioned that Nova will push to RabbitMQ or some
other MQ and workers pull from the queue to translate into PuSH, email,
sms, etc. If
For the record, I should also say I think RabbitMQ is awesome and
should be used for deployments where it makes sense. Keeping it
modular and also allowing burrow to be an option will make more sense
for some deployments.
-Eric
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 07:52:55PM +, Matt Dietz wrote:
For the
+1
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Paul Voccio paul.voc...@rackspace.com wrote:
All,
I would like to nominate Dan Prince (https://launchpad.net/~dan-prince) for
nova-core. He has been a solid contributor in terms of code, reviews and
discussions during the summit.
Thanks,
pvo
+1
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Paul Voccio paul.voc...@rackspace.com
wrote:
All,
I would like to nominate Dan Prince (https://launchpad.net/~dan-prince
) for
nova-core. He has been a solid contributor in terms of code, reviews and
discussions during the summit.
Thanks,
pvo
+1
On May 10, 2011, at 1:25 PM, Josh Kearney wrote:
+1
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Paul Voccio paul.voc...@rackspace.com
wrote:
All,
I would like to nominate Dan Prince (https://launchpad.net/~dan-prince) for
nova-core. He has been a solid contributor in terms of code, reviews
+1
On 5/10/11 3:20 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Paul Voccio paul.voc...@rackspace.com
wrote:
All,
I would like to nominate Dan Prince (https://launchpad.net/~dan-prince)
for
nova-core. He has been a solid contributor in terms of code, reviews
Hi,
Which is the best method on installing nova from source code or any direction
to move over this hurdle is appreciated!
We have followed http://wiki.openstack.org/InstallFromSource to install latest
trunk or Cactus.tgz, but it always gets me to following error and leaving vm
stuck in
As discussed on the mailing list and the #openstack-meeting, the general
consensus was that we create a new development channel. The new IRC channels
on FreeNode are:
#openstack - to be used for Help, Support, Bug reporting, etc
#openstack-dev - to be used as the primary development channel
2011/5/10 Paul Voccio paul.voc...@rackspace.com:
All,
I would like to nominate Dan Prince (https://launchpad.net/~dan-prince) for
nova-core. He has been a solid contributor in terms of code, reviews and
discussions during the summit.
Absolutely +1
If noone protests by Monday morning, I'll
Hey all,
We've been working to improve the Glance API. The first step to
improving the API, however, is to add versioning to it.
We've gotten a lot of the work done on this versioning of the API (see
https://code.launchpad.net/~jaypipes/glance/api-version/+merge/60130).
However, there is an
Would adding new fields into a response bump the minor version number
and not the major? In that case, knowing the exact version would be
nice. In all honesty though, I'm for integer version numbers for APIs
anyway, so every set of changes bumps the revno, and you always have
good documentation
Hi,
I have a question about the FT/HA/LB features of the Openstack. Which seems
similar to this question:
https://answers.launchpad.net/nova/+question/154515
I have know that there is a project named Loadbalance as a service which
is now under develping, but I also learn from some friends
+1 from me too :)
On May 10, 2011, at 6:21 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:
On May 10, 2011, at 4:13 PM, Paul Voccio wrote:
I would like to nominate Dan Prince (https://launchpad.net/~dan-prince) for
nova-core. He has been a solid contributor in terms of code, reviews and
discussions during the
For what it's worth, we're running in a configuration similar to the
one in the attached diagram using VlanManager. When we moved the
nova-network service off of the machine with nova-api, we needed to
add an additional prerouting rule on the network server that prevented
the traffic from being
On May 10, 2011, at 5:52 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
Hey all,
We've been working to improve the Glance API. The first step to
improving the API, however, is to add versioning to it.
We've gotten a lot of the work done on this versioning of the API (see
*#iptables -t nat -A nova-network-POSTROUTING -s 10.0.0.0/12 -d
192.168.1.0/24 -j ACCEPT*
*
*
***That's what I did on nova-network host .*
*
*
*btw , I always isolate nova-network.*
*I'm interesting about **quagga in your environment.*
2011/5/11 Narayan Desai narayan.de...@gmail.com
For what
Hi,
OK.
I'll create the block migration bluprint and a spec. page today (in Japan).
Regards,
Masanori
From: Vishvananda Ishaya vishvana...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Openstack] KVM Block Migration
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 03:57:47 +0900
I don't know if anyone has started work on this feature.
31 matches
Mail list logo
