Hi everyone,
The Gold Members completed their election today. DLA Piper administered the
election and has passed along the results. The eight elected companies and the
individuals they intend to appoint to the board are listed alphabetically below:
Cisco - Lew Tucker
Cloudscaling - Randy Bias
Oops! My last week has been a little crazy. Thanks for straightening me out. =
)
Jonathan
On Aug 7, 2012, at 3:41 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Jonathan Bryce wrote:
Does everyone want to cover this and the supporting projects definition
tomorrow? Anything else? Heat incubation?
We
The OpenStack Foundation has already attracted over 2,000 Individual Members in
a little over a week. It's a very exciting moment for all of us involved in
this effort, but also brings responsibility for each Individual and Corporate
member.
We've learned that someone may have violated the
this situation as it involves behavior outside of the mechanics of
the nominations.
Jonathan
Rick
On 07/29/2012 01:18 AM, Jonathan Bryce wrote:
The OpenStack Foundation has already attracted over 2,000 Individual Members
in a little over a week. It's a very exciting moment for all of us
On Jul 26, 2012, at 6:05 PM, Lloyd Dewolf wrote:
Who receives email sent to secret...@openstack.org? Sorry, I missed
who is the acting secretary. It might be nice to include the person's
name on the page:
http://www.openstack.org/community/openstack-foundation-board-2012-election-candidates/
On Jul 27, 2012, at 4:51 PM, Soren Hansen wrote:
Sorry if it's already been made clear somewhere, but I'm unsure for
what term these individuals are being elected? The bylaws say that the
election happens each year in the first two weeks of January, so is
this an election to fill the seats
Hi everyone,
Last Wednesday we started accepting Individual Members for the OpenStack
Foundation. We've had an excellent response so far with well over 1,000
Individual Members joining in the first week. I wanted to share some important
information about how to nominate and elect the
Hi everyone,
We've been making great progress on the formation of the OpenStack Foundation:
Individual Members can register now at http://openstack.org/join.
The drafting committee has completed their work, and we have a complete set of
legal documents. Our Bylaws, with appendices, and Member
Thanks, Nick. I've added it to the agenda for next Tuesday's meeting at 20:00
UTC/3:00 PM CDT. If you can join the meeting to field any questions, that would
be helpful.
Jonathan
On Jul 5, 2012, at 12:52 PM, Nick Barcet wrote:
Dear members of the Project Policy Board,
After 3 month of
No new topics were raised and the discussion on the TC is occurring on the
mailing list, so no meeting tomorrow.
Please weigh in on the mailing list discussion if you have strong feelings on
the TC structure.
Jonathan
___
Mailing list:
Hi Josh,
We'll be sending out a survey after the conference wraps up and would love to
collect your feedback. We also read emails, wiki pages, blog posts, tweets,
postal mail and sky writing if you have a different preferred method of
providing it.
Jonathan.
Joshua Harlow
We have 2 requests to use openstack.org for community-related technical
projects: one for satellite projects and one as the package name for a java
library. Would you all prefer to discuss tomorrow at 3:00 PM CDT/20:00 UTC or
over email?
Jonathan.
Anyone have anything they would like to discuss tomorrow? After the Essex crush
is over, I'd like to discuss the Technical Committee, but I would say do it
after this week unless anyone objects. Thierry has a draft in the wiki:
http://wiki.openstack.org/Governance/Foundation/TechnicalCommittee
Anyone have topics for tomorrow?
Jonathan.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc
Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Copying Stef so he can chime in.
On Mar 12, 2012, at 2:30 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Joshua McKenty wrote:
I'd love to get an update on the status of the summit - invite codes,
attendance, and session planning. But we can do that offline.
I'll let Stefano give an update on invite codes /
On Friday, March 9, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Thor Wolpert wrote:
I thought a Foundation that paid for legal, marketing and core
services; along with a hosted set of projects whose membership was
based upon meritocracy was the model.
That is and always has been the plan and can be seen in the
Didn't see anything on the list or wiki, so no meeting today.
Jonathan.
On Mar 5, 2012, at 8:43 AM, Jonathan Bryce wrote:
Good catch. Added him as well. Sorry, Dan!
On Mar 5, 2012, at 8:08 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Jonathan Bryce wrote:
Anything we need to discuss? Read through
Anyone have anything to talk about for tomorrow?
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc
Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
-
From: openstack-poc-bounces+ewan.mellor=citrix@lists.launchpad.net
[mailto:openstack-poc-
bounces+ewan.mellor=citrix@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of
Jonathan Bryce
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 8:58 AM
To: openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: [Openstack-poc] Topics
This is just a reminder that we agreed last week to meet again this week to
review progress on Quantum incubation and the questions that were posed. It
sounds like there's definitely been progress on the Quantum+Melange and the
nova-network plan. Dan, feel free to send along any information
I know it's slightly past the 2 pm cutoff, but would like to go ahead and meet
tomorrow to discuss Quantum. Dan is interested in getting Quantum promoted to
core for the Folsom release cycle and we need to review soon if we're going to
make it. I updated the agenda on the wiki.
Jonathan.
Thanks, Jason.
Jay, do you still want to discuss this live tomorrow?
On Jan 30, 2012, at 3:45 PM, Jason Kölker wrote:
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 13:11 -0500, Jay Pipes wrote:
Would it be possible to get an update on the OpenStack Common project
from Jason/MarkM/DanW? I'm interested to learn
Sounds good. Since we didn't have any other items before the cutoff, no meeting
tomorrow.
On Jan 30, 2012, at 5:49 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
No, that's fine as a status update. No need to bring this up tomorrow.
Thanks Jason!
-jay
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Jonathan Bryce jbr
Nothing on the agenda at this point. If you've got something you'd like to add,
put it on the wiki or send an email before 2000 UTC tomorrow. Thanks,
Jonathan.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc
Post to :
Anyone have anything for tomorrow? I've got a conflict at the meeting time, so
if you have a topic to discuss, you're probably also volunteering to run the
meeting. = )
Jonathan.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc
Post to :
Anyone have anything you'd like to discuss today?
Jonathan
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc
Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc
More help :
I don't have anything this week and it doesn't look like anyone else has added
anything to the agenda. Do any of you have anything to discuss?
Jonathan.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc
Post to :
Reminder that we have a PPB meeting scheduled at 2000UTC/2:00 PM CST. Does
anyone have anything they'd like to cover?
One thing that might be worth discussing is a concern several people raised to
me last week at Cloud Expo around the Essex release and having some sort of
quality gate. It
Anyone have any items to discuss? Looks like Mark Nottingham is taking some
steps to move the API guideline discussion forward which was something we were
going to touch base on after the conference. Anything else we should follow up
on?
I need to send out a summary of our in-person meeting,
else for me.
Joshua McKenty
Piston Cloud Computing, Inc.
w: (650) 24-CLOUD
m: (650) 283-6846
jos...@pistoncloud.com
On 2011-10-11, at 10:08 AM, Jonathan Bryce wrote:
Anyone have any items to discuss? Looks like Mark Nottingham is taking some
steps to move the API guideline discussion
How do you all feel about doing our meeting tomorrow over lunch from 1:00-2:00?
This seems to be about the only time that's clear. John Dickinson had the idea
of putting it on sched as well so anyone interested can attend.
Let me know if this works for you all. Thanks,
Jonathan.
Thierry, can you add it to the schedule for 1 tomorrow?
Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
++
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Josh Kearney j...@jk0.org wrote:
Works for me.
On Oct 3, 2011, at 1:38 PM, Jonathan Bryce jbr...@jbryce.com wrote:
How do you all feel about doing our meeting
After the mailing list discussion around APIs a few weeks back, several
community members asked the Project Policy Board to come up with a position on
APIs. The conclusion of the PPB was that each project's PTL will own the
definition and implementation of the project's official API, and APIs
Thanks John for bringing this up and everyone for the input. This is good
feedback. Here are a couple of my thoughts on it:
1) I agree that the meetings get rather chaotic at times. I would say that most
of the time that situation is less related to non-PPB users and more related to
those of
3) Along the lines of getting community feedback, do you all think that we
should move to a two-part process where we discuss, send to a summary to the
community requesting comments and then vote? Should we just try to gather
feedback before we ever discuss?
I'd suggest that for most
This is on the agenda for Tuesday's policy board meeting (in #openstack-meeting
1 hour before the weekly OpenStack team meeting for those interested). Sounds
like a potentially acceptable solution is to set some cross-project API
standards and then push the remainder of the API definition and
We have several agenda items for today's meeting at 2000UTC/3:00 PM CDT:
http://wiki.openstack.org/Governance/PPB
1. Common project tooling and process (autonomy)
2. Github + Gerrit review
3. Deadline for Essex core projects applications
For Item 1, I have created a draft in the wiki:
As a reminder, we have a Policy Board meeting scheduled for tomorrow in the
hour before the weekly team meeting. The Policy Board meeting is 2000 UTC/3:00
PM CDT.
We currently have two incubation applications on the agenda. If you get an
opportunity, please try to review them before the
Earlier is fine with me if that makes it easier for others.
Does 1900 UTC/2:00 PM CDT Monday work as a new time for everyone?
Jonathan.
On Apr 14, 2011, at 8:00 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Soren Hansen wrote:
Not sure why, but I didn't get Jonathan's original post in this thread.
Anyways,
Anyone have any agenda items for tomorrow? Thierry has scheduled a session at
the design summit to talk releases which was a pending item. I don't have
anything else to discuss right now.
Jonathan.
___
Mailing list:
=openstack@lists.launchpad.net] On
Behalf Of Ewan Mellor
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 10:01 AM
To: Jonathan Bryce; openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack-poc] PPB Meeting
I don't have anything for the agenda -- happy to skip it.
Ewan.
-Original Message-
From
[mailto:openstack-poc-
bounces+ewan.mellor=citrix@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of
Jonathan Bryce
Sent: 17 March 2011 16:52
To: openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack-poc] Meeting today
Jesse said he would be able to do 20:00 UTC/3:00 PM CDT today. We have
three items that we
.
-Original Message-
From: openstack-poc-bounces+ewan.mellor=citrix@lists.launchpad.net
[mailto:openstack-poc-
bounces+ewan.mellor=citrix@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of
Jonathan Bryce
Sent: 10 March 2011 16:26
To: openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: [Openstack-poc] Meeting
We're scheduled for a meeting today at 20:00 UTC/2:00 PM CST. Who's going to be
able to make it? I know several of you are traveling.
Jonathan.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack-poc
Post to : openstack-poc@lists.launchpad.net
Reminder that we've got a meeting today at 2100UTC/3:00 PM central.
On Feb 15, 2011, at 11:02 AM, Jonathan Bryce wrote:
In the meeting last week, we approved the 2011 Scope and Charter and
discussed the image format proposal and intermediate releases without any
final decision. John Purrier
45 matches
Mail list logo
