[Openstack] Folsom TryStack on RHEL

2013-04-23 Thread Nachi Ueno
Hi TryStack Users Please take my apologies for delaying deploy x86 Zones. We are happy to announce new Folsom X86 zone. http://trystack.org/ http://x86.trystack.org/dashboard/ One great news is Red Hat's starts contributing, The cluster is now managed by Redhat and it is running on RHEL. Some

Re: [Openstack] Folsom TryStack on RHEL

2013-04-23 Thread Nachi Ueno
On Wednesday 24 April 2013 04:46 AM, Nachi Ueno wrote: Hi TryStack Users Please take my apologies for delaying deploy x86 Zones. We are happy to announce new Folsom X86 zone. http://trystack.org/ http://x86.trystack.org/dashboard/ One great news is Red Hat's starts contributing, The cluster is now

Re: [Openstack] Use of MAC addresses in Openstack VMs

2012-10-20 Thread Nachi Ueno
Hi Brad To me, a global range that everyone is using that's provided by OpenStack is seems much worse than just calculating an arbitrary private range by flipping bit b2 to 1 as shown in the wiki article below. As long as you set this, you're guaranteed not to collide with any registered

Re: [Openstack] TC Candidacy

2012-09-19 Thread Nachi Ueno
+1 ! Thank you for your working hard for CI :) 2012/9/19 Monty Taylor mord...@inaugust.com: Hi everybody! I'd like to run for a seat on the Technical Committee. - OpenStack Experience - I run the CI and Developer Automation team for OpenStack. There hasn't always been a team, but as long

Re: [Openstack] TRYSTACK DOWN TIME AND RUNTIME ERRORS!!!

2012-09-14 Thread Nachi Ueno
Hi Syed Sorry for inconvenience. Recent several website down is due to misconfiguration of Apache. Some proxy settings looks wrong, so IMO this is not problem of OpenStack itself. I'll fix this issue ASAP. Thank you for your notice Nachi Ueno 2012/9/14 Syed Armani dce3...@gmail.com: Hi

Re: [Openstack] TC candidacy

2012-09-14 Thread Nachi Ueno
+1 ! 2012/9/14 Tres Henry t...@treshenry.net: Hella +1 On Sep 14, 2012, at 10:55 AM, Bhandaru, Malini K malini.k.bhand...@intel.com wrote: +1 -Original Message- From: openstack-bounces+malini.k.bhandaru=intel@lists.launchpad.net

Re: [Openstack] [Netstack] [openstack-dev] [Quantum] Multi-host implementation

2012-08-06 Thread Nachi Ueno
approach (need only be a couple paragraphs, perhaps with a diagram) linked to the blueprint so we can have a design discussion around it. Thanks, Dan On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Nachi Ueno na...@nttmcl.com wrote: Hi folks Sorry. I added openstack-...@lists.openstack.org

Re: [Openstack] [Quantum] Multi-host implementation

2012-08-03 Thread Nachi Ueno
Hi folks Sorry. I added openstack-...@lists.openstack.org in this discussion. 2012/8/3 Nati Ueno nati.u...@gmail.com: Hi folks Gary Thank you for your comment. I wanna discuss your point on the mailing list. Yusuke pushed Multi-host implementation for review.

Re: [Openstack] [Quantum] Update policy of device_id

2012-08-03 Thread Nachi Ueno
be update port device_id for None. But this is depends on how we solve bug 1031473. Any thought? -- Nachi Ueno email:nati.u...@gmail.com twitter:http://twitter.com/nati ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack

Re: [Openstack] [KeyStone] Requestid, context, notification in Keystone

2012-07-23 Thread Nachi Ueno
Hi Joe,Jay Thanks Jay Joe This is from quantum - Quantum Quantum Notification https://blueprints.launchpad.net/quantum/+spec/quantum-notifications Improve scalability by eliminating agent DB polling https://blueprints.launchpad.net/quantum/+spec/scalable-agent-comms ( This blueprint trying

[Openstack] [KeyStone] Requestid, context, notification in Keystone

2012-07-20 Thread Nachi Ueno
Hi Joe Nova ,Glance,Quantum(WIP) support Requestid, context, notification concept. IMO, Keystone should also have same functionality. Do you have any thought about this? Thank you in advance Nachi Ueno ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net

Re: [Openstack] Keystone Federation

2012-07-05 Thread Nachi Ueno
Let's use skype Mine is nati.ueno 2012/7/5 Matt Joyce matt.jo...@cloudscaling.com: Don't know if we want it. But we may want to consider the idea of satellite read only keystone servers. Mind you that may just be solving problems we don't even have yet. -Matt On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at

Re: [Openstack] Keystone Federation

2012-07-05 Thread Nachi Ueno
Sorry for my wrong mail 2012/7/5 Nachi Ueno ueno.na...@nttdata-agilenet.com: Let's use skype Mine is nati.ueno 2012/7/5 Matt Joyce matt.jo...@cloudscaling.com: Don't know if we want it. But we may want to consider the idea of satellite read only keystone servers. Mind you that may just

Re: [Openstack] request and transaction IDs across all projects

2012-06-12 Thread Nachi Ueno
+1 In addition, Nova itself should accept request ID as a transaction ID. Nova is also one of callee in the sequence of transaction. Nachi 2012/6/11 Gabe Westmaas gabe.westm...@rackspace.com: In nova we use a request ID to to help in finding all logs associated with a particular request, and

Re: [Openstack] request and transaction IDs across all projects

2012-06-12 Thread Nachi Ueno
Thoughts?  Do you buy the need for both a request ID and a transaction ID? Sure. Just curious where you think the dividing line is -- the project (Nova, Glance) or the service/workers (nova-api, nova-compute, etc). IMO, we should use one single id to track transaction for all project.

[Openstack] How to setup vncproxy with ubuntu precise package?

2012-04-12 Thread Nachi Ueno
Hi folks I'm trying to setup vncproxy with ubuntu package on precise. But I could'nt find document how to setup them. If you there are information, could you share me? Thank you in advance Nachi ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post

Re: [Openstack] OpenStack 2012.1 (Essex) is RELEASED !

2012-04-05 Thread Nachi Ueno
Wot! 2012/4/5 Chuck Short chuck.sh...@canonical.com: Hi, We have packages available for Ubuntu Precise 12.04 now as well. Regards chuck On Thu, 5 Apr 2012 16:13:12 + Jim Curry jim.cu...@rackspace.com wrote: Congrats and thank you to everyone involved! On 4/5/12 10:30 AM,

Re: [Openstack] OpenStack Plugin for Jenkins

2012-04-04 Thread Nachi Ueno
Justin++ This is really cool plugin. Good Job! 2012/4/4 Justin Santa Barbara jus...@fathomdb.com: I've created a quick OpenStack plugin for Jenkins, using the Java bindings that Luis I created. It's available on github here:  https://github.com/platformlayer/openstack-jenkins  (no binaries

Re: [Openstack] Ubuntu OpenStack QA Lab up and running

2012-01-26 Thread Nachi Ueno
HI Robbie Awesome! Can I ask some questions? 1. Is there any document or opensource of your juju-based ci-deployment? 2. Which kind of test are you running after deploy test? Cheers Nati 2012/1/26 Robbie Williamson rob...@ubuntu.com:

Re: [Openstack] Ubuntu OpenStack QA Lab up and running

2012-01-26 Thread Nachi Ueno
Hi Robbie Thank you for your quick reply. 2012/1/26 Robbie Williamson rob...@ubuntu.com: On 01/26/2012 02:49 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote: HI Robbie Awesome! Can I ask some questions? 1. Is there any document or opensource of your juju-based ci-deployment? This is coming *real* soon, we just

[Openstack] Unique key is case-sensitive or *in*sensitive?

2012-01-10 Thread Nachi Ueno
Hi folks Nova,Keystone,Glance uses RDBMS and they use unique key constraints. Nowadays, we can use Mysql,Sqlite,Postgresql. Unfortunately, the unique key behaviors of each DB are different. - Mysql : case-insensitive - Sqlite : case-sensitive - Postgresql : case-sensitive I wanna know the spec

Re: [Openstack] Unique key is case-sensitive or *in*sensitive?

2012-01-10 Thread Nachi Ueno
... MODIFY COLUMN ... CHARACTER SET ... COLLATION ... *_cs would need to be done for affected tables. -jay On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Nachi Ueno ueno.na...@nttdata-agilenet.com wrote: Hi folks Nova,Keystone,Glance uses RDBMS and they use unique key constraints. Nowadays, we can use

Re: [Openstack] Automatically confirmed after 24 hours on Resize API

2011-12-27 Thread Nachi Ueno
sure it gets done. Thanks! Brian On Dec 26, 2011, at 11:48 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote: Hi folks The doc says *All resizes are automatically confirmed after 24 hours if they are not explicitly confirmed or reverted*, but I couldn't found such implementations. Is this a bug of Nova

[Openstack] Automatically confirmed after 24 hours on Resize API

2011-12-26 Thread Nachi Ueno
if they are not explicitly confirmed or reverted*. http://docs.openstack.org/api/openstack-compute/1.1/content/Resize_Server-d1e3707.html Cheers Nachi Ueno ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe

Re: [Openstack] Gating on deployment and integration tests for stable/diablo

2011-12-09 Thread Nachi Ueno
Yes, our next focus will be on a post-commit integration test job for trunk.  That means we don't have to have all the technical problems solved before we start testing trunk but we can draw attention to bugs. Super awesome!! Jim++ -Jim ___

[Openstack] Delete server spec

2011-12-07 Thread Nachi Ueno
Hi folks I wanna make Delete server spec clear. The API doc says, When a server is deleted, all images created from that server are also removed http://docs.openstack.org/api/openstack-compute/1.1/content/Delete_Server-d1e2883.html IMO, all images is vm images which stored on compute node

Re: [Openstack] Delete server spec

2011-12-07 Thread Nachi Ueno
that to include the snapshots - but I'm not sure that is what I'd expect as a user. On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Nachi Ueno ueno.na...@nttdata-agilenet.com wrote: Hi folks I wanna make Delete server spec clear. The API doc says, When a server is deleted, all images created from that server

Re: [Openstack] API specifications

2011-12-02 Thread Nachi Ueno
Waldon On Dec 1, 2011, at 1:37 PM, Nachi Ueno wrote: Hi Nova-cores Is the Console function in OS API 1.1 specs? (See https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/898266) The implementation is not in contrib directory, so it didn't looks an extension. But as 898266 mentioned, it is not described

Re: [Openstack] API specifications

2011-12-02 Thread Nachi Ueno
Hi Chris Sorry, I missed that. Would you give me url? Such as console.py, it is not in contrib directory. 2011/12/2 Christopher MacGown ch...@pistoncloud.com: Hi Nachi, At least for config_drive, it has been documented as an extension. - chris On Dec 2, 2011, at 10:07, Nachi Ueno ueno.na

Re: [Openstack] API specifications

2011-12-02 Thread Nachi Ueno
. Gabe On 12/2/11 12:01 PM, Nachi Ueno ueno.na...@nttdata-agilenet.com wrote: Hi Brian Thank you for your response. How about params which is missing in docs? accessIPv4 accessIPv6 adminPass config_drive security_groups networks blob keyname availability_zone reservation_id min_count max_count 2011

Re: [Openstack] API specifications

2011-12-02 Thread Nachi Ueno
, Christopher MacGown wrote: Hi Nachi, At least for config_drive, it has been documented as an extension. - chris On Dec 2, 2011, at 10:07, Nachi Ueno ueno.na...@nttdata-agilenet.com wrote: Hi Brian Thank you for your response. How about params which is missing in docs? accessIPv4

[Openstack] API specifications

2011-12-01 Thread Nachi Ueno
Hi Nova-cores Is the Console function in OS API 1.1 specs? (See https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/898266) The implementation is not in contrib directory, so it didn't looks an extension. But as 898266 mentioned, it is not described in API docs. And also, I checked API spces from code. (I

Re: [Openstack] [nova-testing] Efforts for Essex

2011-11-29 Thread Nachi Ueno
[bug883293 81e49b7] combination of log_notifier and log.PublishErrorsHandler causes infinite loop Fixes bug 883293.  Author: Nachi Ueno ueno.na...@lab.ntt.co.jp  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) jpipes@uberbox:~/repos/nova$ git cherry-pick 9cf5945c9e64d1c6a2eb6d9499e80d6c19aed058

Re: [Openstack] Bug fixes and test cases submitted against stable/diablo

2011-11-10 Thread Nachi Ueno
wrote: 2011/11/9 Nachi Ueno ueno.na...@nttdata-agilenet.com: I understand your point. Stop QAing stable/diablo and focus on Essex. Oh, no no. That's not the point. I'm thrilled to have you work on QAing Diablo. The only issue is that the fixes you come up with should be pushed to Essex

Re: [Openstack] Bug fixes and test cases submitted against stable/diablo

2011-11-08 Thread Nachi Ueno
Hi Mark Thank you for your sharing discussion. # hmm, If I could create new instance of me, problem will be fixed. I understand your point. Stop QAing stable/diablo and focus on Essex. Ideally, we should focus on upstream branch. Ideally, we can start use the code after release out. However the

[Openstack] Branch coverage

2011-05-24 Thread Nachi Ueno
coverage. Is it possible to let http://jenkins.openstack.org/ support branch coverage? This feature helps QA of nova. Regards, Nachi Ueno ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack Post to : openstack@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https

Re: [Openstack] Testing

2011-05-10 Thread Nachi Ueno
Hello Vish. I would like to support testing effort. I wrote an example very basic unit test doc and some tips how to use pudb and nose-pudb. http://etherpad.openstack.org/diablo-testing Regards Nachi Ueno NTT ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net