On 7/15/13 6:52 AM, Leandro Reox wrote:
Hi guys,
I was wondering if there any plans or maybe already exist a feature or a
flag for the account reaping process to make it gradually. We had one
case with an account with millions of files, that was plain deleted, an
that triggers the deletion of
On 7/12/13 12:34 AM, Jonathan Lu wrote:
Hi, all stackers,
I test the cluster and get such error msg:
Jul 12 11:23:57 ubuntu-12 proxy-server ERROR with Object server
192.168.1.161:60
00/xvdb1 re: Trying to get final status of PUT to
/v1/AUTH_test/test_8/e9a243cb0
On 7/10/13 2:25 AM, Axel Christiansen wrote:
Hello List,
does one has to use the real device names in ring-building, like:
swift-ring-builder account.builder add z5-10.0.6.204:6002/sda4 100
Here it is sda4.
Can one use the partition UUID value or the mount point?
It's really a mount point,
The tempurl key is just a metadata attribute on the account with a
particular name. swiftclient already supports setting metadata on
accounts (and containers and objects); no changes are needed.
$ swift post -m temp-url-key:correcthorsebatterystaple
On 4/30/13 10:43 AM, Shrinand Javadekar
On 4/6/13 11:13 AM, Victor Rodionov wrote:
Hello,
Now in Swift object server (swift.object.server.DiskFile) for
serialization objects meta data used python cPickle module.
So the question is why not use other portable serialization format for
this, for example JSON?
If you're asking why the
On 2/5/13 9:04 AM, Guillaume Hilt wrote:
Hello,
I installed swift on Ubuntu 12.04 AMD64 following this howto:
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/swift/howto_installmultinode.html
However, although the storage nodes work fine, I can't start the proxy
node :
Feb 5 18:00:06 srv13 proxy-server
On 1/3/13 7:07 AM, Leander Bessa Beernaert wrote:
Hello all,
Could some please confirm my analysis of the ring creation in swift?
I need to run a few benchmarks on a set of data (200GB) total and need
it to be replicated at least 3 times.
From the Swift docs [1], I understood that the
On 10/22/12 9:38 AM, Emre Sokullu wrote:
Hi folks,
At GROU.PS, we've been an OpenStack SWIFT user for more than 1.5 years
now. Currently, we hold about 18TB of data on 3 storage nodes. Since
we hit 84% in utilization, we have recently decided to expand the
storage with more disks.
In order to
On 10/15/12 5:36 PM, Duan, Jiangang wrote:
Some of our customers are interested in Erasure code than tri-replicate to save
disk space.
We propose a BP Light weight Erasure code framework for swift, which can be
found here https://blueprints.launchpad.net/swift/+spec/swift-ec
The general idea
On 7/5/12 9:21 AM, Anatoly Legkodymov wrote:
Good day,
File proxy/server.py contains following construction several times
(simplifed):
nodes = ring.get_nodes()
shuffle(nodes)
for node in nodes:
...
I found it useful for balancing from the first sight, but deeper
On 6/19/12 12:13 PM, John Dickinson wrote:
It looks like Florian (at Rackspace) is working on that blueprint. He just
assigned it to himself.
I'm happy to hear that you have some extra devs for swift work. I'd love to
help coordinate some swift goals with you.
Off the top of my head, here
11 matches
Mail list logo
