Hi Daryl,
I understand what you're trying to accomplish by creating a new client for the
tests, but I'm not sure why the interface has to be completely different from
the official set of Python client bindings. If it used the same interface
everyone in the community could then benefit from the
Great point Justin. I've worked on projects where this has happened repeatedly
and it's a drag.
From: openstack-bounces+tim.simpson=rackspace@lists.launchpad.net
[openstack-bounces+tim.simpson=rackspace@lists.launchpad.net] on behalf of
Justin Santa
I'm with the Reddwarf (Database as a Service) team at Rackspace. We employ a
large set of integration / functional tests which run in a Vagrant controlled
VM.
Our tests use python-novaclient as well as a similar client for Reddwarf we've
written ourselves. The motivation is to eat our own dog
found it to be a mistake-TestNG really did think out how to do
this pretty well.
We should talk sometime, I think each project could gain a lot from it.
From: Matt Dietz
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 12:22 PM
To: Tim Simpson; Jay Pipes
Cc: openstack
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 3:16 PM
To: Tim Simpson; Matt Dietz; Jay Pipes
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Integration tests
On 9/12/11 2:54 PM, Tim Simpson tim.simp...@rackspace.com wrote:
It would be advantageous for the tests to only use one client, whatever
The Skip plugin for nose offers similar functionality which can be used in
Python 2.6:
http://somethingaboutorange.com/mrl/projects/nose/0.11.1/plugins/skip.html
Using this you can write decorators that raise SkipTest if a certain criteria
isn't met.
6 matches
Mail list logo
