I'd like to point out a change I have waiting for reviews in Nova, in
case it has any impact: https://review.openstack.org/#change,2593
This is a user-launchable image that can connect from a VLAN to a
floating address as it is launched. It serves much the same function
as a cloudpipe, but can
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 5:26 AM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Todd,
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 18:29 -0500, Todd Willey wrote:
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote:
The previous thread here that I contributed to felt a little like
Thierry and I
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Mark,
On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 15:16 -0500, m...@openstack.org wrote:
As Jim mentioned, I'm going to focus on establishing the foundation
this year and am really excited to be able to dedicate the time and
attention it
+1
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya
vishvana...@gmail.com wrote:
Lorin has been a great contributor to Nova for a long time and has been
participating heavily in reviews over the past couple of months. I think he
would be a great addition to nova-core.
Vish
Plus one
On Nov 9, 2011 9:25 AM, Brian Waldon brian.wal...@rackspace.com wrote:
I'd like to nominate Johannes for nova-core, as he has definitely been
doing a good number of reviews lately.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~openstack
Post to
One thing that might be added would be dynamic module and class
loading. This has implications for flags/options and help output as
well. It is something nova does, and I suspect keystone and others
will need to do as well.
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 2:59 PM, Devin Carlen devin.car...@gmail.com
I think people will probably deploy in such a way that clients talk to
80 or 443. But there are a number of ways to get to that outcome,
including specifying it in the server configuration, or running behind
load balancers or other front-end services. Running everything be
default on different
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Todd Willey t...@ansolabs.com wrote:
I'd prefer to keep it convenient to develop and demo on a single
machine. I don't think there is any added inconvenience during
deployment if the ports
I'd prefer to keep it convenient to develop and demo on a single
machine. I don't think there is any added inconvenience during
deployment if the ports are not the standard http ports.
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
As I stated on our Skype chat
Agreed. Wholeheartedly.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Trey Morris trey.mor...@rackspace.com wrote:
I like vish's idea. instead of 999, maybe it should be anything over 9000.
-tr3buchet
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Brian Schott bfsch...@gmail.com wrote:
That's not crazy, but I'd
+1
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya
vishvana...@gmail.com wrote:
While I was checking branch merges, I noticed that Brian Lamar (blamar), is
not listed as a nova-core developer. This is most definitely a travesty, as
he has been one of the most prolific coders/reviewers
I'm for zone-generated ids. If we take user input it is one more
thing to sanitize and scope accordingly. As the number is essentially
disposable, I don't know why they would care to provide one anyway, it
just seems like changing who is responsible for making a uuid.
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at
Would adding new fields into a response bump the minor version number
and not the major? In that case, knowing the exact version would be
nice. In all honesty though, I'm for integer version numbers for APIs
anyway, so every set of changes bumps the revno, and you always have
good documentation
Looks like the directories need to be named base 16. See
nova/images/local.py line 60 (in trunk).
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Yang, Fred fred.y...@intel.com wrote:
Hi,
I am installing nova from the latest source trunk following
http://wiki.openstack.org/InstallFromSource as a newbie
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 5:39 AM, Dirk-Willem van Gulik
dirk-willem.van.gu...@bbc.co.uk wrote:
On 3 May 2011, at 10:31, Soren Hansen wrote:
2011/5/3 Todd Willey t...@ansolabs.com:
In a heavily load-balanced environment you'll probably want to terminate
SSL before it gets
proxied
We should be able to do it with a wsgi middleware and either include
it or not in the paste config file. In a heavily load-balanced
environment you'll probably want to terminate SSL before it gets
proxied to the actual api servers, but it would be nice to support the
simple case where the api
Open == Accessible. Open != Verbose. I'm willing to discuss more at
the design summit, but my biggest concern is that we let the most
people possible can contribute. This includes those who work behind
closed doors on their own pet projects.
This thread started specifically in response to a
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Ewan Mellor ewan.mel...@eu.citrix.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Todd Willey
Sent: 28 March 2011 21:11
To: Jay Pipes
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Feature Freeze status
[Snip]
Clearly blueprints are about process
I'd like to go on record as saying that anything related to nova or
openstack that doesn't allow you to configure which public API you're
consuming shouldn't bear the name nova or openstack. If you look at
http://nova.openstack.org/ you see API Compatibility in bold as one
of our design
Ditto erl cpp.
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 3:57 AM, Vishvananda Ishaya
vishvana...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 for Erlang from me. I'm hoping to never have to see C++ templates again :)
On Feb 21, 2011, at 10:58 PM, Devin Carlen wrote:
It's been discussed a fair amount already, but I think this is a
20 matches
Mail list logo
