I’m not a core member anymore, but I completely agree with John. The
company affiliation should not be the reason to deny somebody’s promotion
to the core team.
If core members from the particular company will try to influence the
project development in the wrong way – it will be a completely
Hi Ghe,
I suppose it will be very useful. We are planning to create a new project
for nova-volumes (cider?) and I’m sure it will have same duplicate classes.
Sooner we will have a common openstack layer is better.
Regards,
-Vladimir
*From:*
+1
-Original Message-
From: openstack-bounces+vladimir=zadarastorage@lists.launchpad.net
[mailto:openstack-bounces+vladimir=zadarastorage@lists.launchpad.net]
On Behalf Of John Griffith
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 4:21 PM
To: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: [Openstack]
Hi Vish All,
We would definitely prefer to leave the code in place and ready to fix any
issues related to it.
We found out that it is extremely hard to work with latest trunk version -
our QA was constantly complaining about different regression scenarios and
we decided to stick with released
.
Thanks,
-Vladimir
-Original Message-
From: Vishvananda Ishaya [mailto:vishvana...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 8:57 AM
To: Vladimir Popovski
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Removal of VSA Code
Vladimir,
Are you sure the code in trunk is working
, March 15, 2012 9:53 AM
To: Vladimir Popovski
Cc: Vishvananda Ishaya; openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Removal of VSA Code
On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 09:02 -0700, Vladimir Popovski wrote:
I was not aware of any issue with VSA code in diablo/stable (or at
least major issues).
I'll
Folks,
We’ve used IRC #openstack-volumes for that and had a mailing-list set up
for the team. Check it out on https://launchpad.net/~openstack-volume
Unfortunately, there was not much going on lately. Primarily I suppose you
can blame me on this as our team was completely overwhelmed by
Vish,
We are not sure if this particular issue may cause any problem, but just
wanted to understand what is wrong.
To provide a bit more data about this particular environment:
- Dedicated servers config at RAX
- FlatDHCP mode with primary NIC (eth0) bridged and used
Hi All,
As it was discussed during the Design Summit, there was a desire to create a
Working Group for Nova Volume changes.
If you would like to participate, pls feel free to add yourself to:
https://launchpad.net/~openstack-volume
and/or its mailing list:
Alex et al,
I’ve succeeded to reproduce this problem by issuing multiple concurrent
euca-allocate-address euca-release-address calls.
Here is one of traces from nova-api.log:
2011-09-23 22:07:24,355 ERROR nova.api [3a5ae61d-4e6a-4701-9180-ef6c49a76c61
diego nubeblog] Unexpected error
Hi Chuck,
This idea is very good aligned with some functionality we intend to
propose as part of our Virtual Storage Array feature.
I suppose in general the goal here is to be able to create a volume from
storage of specified class. For me it means that:
1. User should be able to select storage
that user data is working in the
SecurityGroupTests by passing in a script proxy script that runs on boot.
Vish
On Jun 8, 2011, at 5:36 PM, Vladimir Popovski wrote:
Folks,
Have anybody tried to inject user data into instances? Or if anybody
actually tried to use Cloudpipe / VPN
Folks,
Have anybody tried to inject user data into instances? Or if anybody
actually tried to use Cloudpipe / VPN functionality?
It seems like there is some code missing (at least on libvirt/connection
level).
If I’m not missing anything, EC2 RunInstances takes user_data from kwargs
13 matches
Mail list logo
