On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 2:47 AM, Sylvain Bauza sylvain.ba...@digimind.comwrote:
Thanks Jerome for the clarification.
I just posted out a blogpost for adding a Second volume to Cinder in
Folsom [3]. Maybe it could be merged with the official Folsom Ubuntu Cinder
documentation ? There is only
Hi Anne,
Thanks for the quick reply.
Le 04/06/2013 16:00, Anne Gentle a écrit :
If that's all a bit too much, we can work on it from your blog entry,
I've created this doc bug to track the work:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-manuals/+bug/1187400. Feel free
to assign yourself.
Thanks Jerome for the clarification.
I just posted out a blogpost for adding a Second volume to Cinder in
Folsom [3]. Maybe it could be merged with the official Folsom Ubuntu
Cinder documentation ? There is only H/A aspects that are mentioned by now.
Someone from the documentation team ?
Putting openstack-ops@ in the loop :-)
Le 30/05/2013 17:26, Sylvain Bauza a écrit :
Le 30/05/2013 15:25, Sylvain Bauza a écrit :
Hi,
It sounds quite unclear for me about the possibility *in Folsom* to
have two distinct Cinder hosts having each one LVM backend called
cinder-volumes ?
As
Hi Sylvain,
Maybe the folsom documentation for cinder will help you:
http://docs.openstack.org/folsom/openstack-compute/install/apt/content/osfolubuntu-cinder.html
Regards,
Jérôme
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Sylvain Bauza
sylvain.ba...@digimind.comwrote:
Putting openstack-ops@ in the
Thanks but it didn't match my needs. I already know how to deploy Cinder
on a single host, my point was more relative to deploying a second
Cinder-volume instance, and if yes, what to do.
Nevermind, I successed in deploying a second Cinder-volume, just by
looking at the packages and the
Hi Sylvain,
Great to know that you found how to solve your issue.
Thanks for reporting that you found the Grizzly doc confusing.
In fact, the Grizzly release introduced the multi-backend feature. This
feature allows to have more than one backend on a same compute (ie, to be
able to have several
Le 30/05/2013 15:25, Sylvain Bauza a écrit :
Hi,
It sounds quite unclear for me about the possibility *in Folsom* to
have two distinct Cinder hosts having each one LVM backend called
cinder-volumes ?
As per the doc [1], I would say the answer is no, but could you please
confirm ?
If so,
8 matches
Mail list logo
