: Re: [Openstack] Generalsied host aggregates in Folsom
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Day, Phil
philip@hp.commailto:philip@hp.com wrote:
Thanks Joe,
I was anticipating something more complex to be able to say when an aggregate
should or shouldn't be linked to the hypevisor
: openstack@lists.launchpad.netmailto:openstack@lists.launchpad.net
(openstack@lists.launchpad.netmailto:openstack@lists.launchpad.net)
(openstack@lists.launchpad.netmailto:openstack@lists.launchpad.net)
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Generalsied host aggregates in Folsom
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Day
Hi Folks,
Trying to catch-up (I'm thinking of changing my middle name to catch-up :) )
with the generalisation of host aggregates - and looking at the code it looks
to me as if the chain for adding a host to an aggregate still ends up calling
the virt layer
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Day, Phil philip@hp.com wrote:
Hi Folks,
** **
Trying to catch-up (I’m thinking of changing my middle name to catch-up J
) with the generalisation of host aggregates – and looking at the code it
looks to me as if the chain for adding a host to an
] Generalsied host aggregates in Folsom
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Day, Phil
philip@hp.commailto:philip@hp.com wrote:
Hi Folks,
Trying to catch-up (I'm thinking of changing my middle name to catch-up :) )
with the generalisation of host aggregates - and looking at the code it looks
:* openstack@lists.launchpad.net (openstack@lists.launchpad.net) (
openstack@lists.launchpad.net)
*Subject:* Re: [Openstack] Generalsied host aggregates in Folsom
** **
** **
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Day, Phil philip@hp.com wrote:
Hi Folks,
Trying to catch
6 matches
Mail list logo
