@lists.launchpad.net (openstack@lists.launchpad.net); Johnson,
Andrew Gordon (HP Cloud Services); Hassan, Ahmad; Haynes, David;
nova-datab...@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Is there a reason Nova doesn't use scoped sessions in
sqlalchemy ?
All of the workers are single-threaded, so I'm
To: Day, Phil
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net (openstack@lists.launchpad.net); Johnson,
Andrew Gordon (HP Cloud Services); Hassan, Ahmad; Haynes, David;
nova-datab...@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Is there a reason Nova doesn't use scoped sessions
in sqlalchemy ?
All
Hi Folks,
We've been looking into a problem which looks a lot like:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/855660
2011-10-21 14:13:31,035 ERROR nova.api [5bd52130-d46f-4702-b06b-9ca5045473d7
smokeuser smokeproject] Unexpected error raised: Parent instance FixedIp at
0x4e74490 is not bound to
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 3:25 PM, Day, Phil philip@hp.com wrote:
Hi Folks,
We’ve been looking into a problem which looks a lot like:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/855660
2011-10-21 14:13:31,035 ERROR nova.api [5bd52130-d46f-4702-b06b-9ca5045473d7
smokeuser smokeproject]
All of the workers are single-threaded, so I'm not sure that scoped sessions
are really necessary.
We did however decide that objects from the db layer are supposed to be simple
dictionaries. We currently allow nested dictionaries to optimize joined
objects. Unfortunately we never switched to
5 matches
Mail list logo