2011/12/11 Stefano Maffulli :
>> Any time you find will be in someone's evening and in someone else's
>> middle-of-the-night, and most of us probably also have busy calendars.
> What is not clear to me is if you would like to reduce the amount of
> meetings or just not add more.
One step at a time
On Sat, 2011-12-10 at 10:13 +0100, Soren Hansen wrote:
> Any time you find will be in someone's evening and in someone else's
> middle-of-the-night, and most of us probably also have busy calendars.
We should try to limit the amount of meetings that require wide
participation to the very strict ne
On Dec 10, 2011 1:13 AM, "Paul Voccio"
wrote:
> I'm not sure why this frustration is directed at me.
Because you're talking about calling a meeting as being no big deal,
which might be true if everyone were in the same office, but when we're
spread across the planet, it *is* a big deal.
> My poi
2011/12/10 Trey Morris :
> This problem has to have been solved before. Anyone know how
> multinational companies deal with meetings?
The distro team meetings at Canonical used to rotate 8 hours every week
to distribute the pain. Eventually, though, we gave up having these big
meetings altogether.
This problem has to have been solved before. Anyone know how multinational
companies deal with meetings? Also, Soren, to be fair, I'm don't believe
I've heard anyone propose a meeting that wasn't on ~utc-7 business time,
yourself included. Maybe there should be some give and take here? Perhaps
this
- Original message -
> 2011/12/9 Paul Voccio :
> We put *every* single meeting in this
> project in US business hours, *every* single meeting *outside* European
> and Japanese business hours
If I may, also *every* time it's out of reach for
an normal humain living in GMT+8 (China,
Singapo
Soren:
Your concerns are perfectly reasonable. We will try to come up with a plan for
communication that doesn't involve more meetings. I'm already in way too many
meetings as it is. We will do Monday without you and take your concerns into
account for our plans.
Everyone Else:
The simple a
2011/12/9 Paul Voccio :
> I think the benefits of an "all hands" irc/irl meeting is to reduce
> the overall amount of time needed to drive to a decision. I can
> usually do this in a 30 minute meeting if I have the relevant people
> and have a handful of items that need to be decided upon. Having t
2011/12/8 Vishvananda Ishaya :
> I'm hesitant to do more meetings as well, but we do need some
> coordination.
I call false dichotomy on this. I don't buy the "without meetings, we
can't coordinate anything" notion.
> I will leave the one for Monday on the board for now. Lets have one
> meeting
I'm hesitant to do more meetings as well, but we do need some coordination. I
will leave the one for Monday on the board for now. Lets have one meeting with
the goal being to never need another one. I'm sure we can come up with an
alternate way to communicate.
IDEA: We could have a "status" et
Weekly status emails sent to whom? I think it could be a good idea but my
worry is that while the mailing list is efficient in terms of information
per second, it's an inefficient place for coordinating. Solve this and I'm
on board.
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 7:26 AM, Soren Hansen wrote:
> 2011/12/8
2011/12/8 Thierry Carrez :
> Soren Hansen wrote:
>> 2011/12/7 Vishvananda Ishaya :
>>> 1) Weekly meeting for team leads. This is a time for us to discuss blueprint
>>> progress, multiple-team-related issues, etc. Going to shoot for Mondays at
>>> 2100 for this one. I really need the subteam leads
Soren Hansen wrote:
> 2011/12/7 Vishvananda Ishaya :
>> 1) Weekly meeting for team leads. This is a time for us to discuss blueprint
>> progress, multiple-team-related issues, etc. Going to shoot for Mondays at
>> 2100 for this one. I really need the subteam leads to commit to making this
>> meeti
: openstack@lists.launchpad.net (openstack@lists.launchpad.net)
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Nova Subteam Changes
2011/12/7 Vishvananda Ishaya :
> 1) Weekly meeting for team leads. This is a time for us to discuss blueprint
> progress, multiple-team-related issues, etc. Going to shoot for Mond
2011/12/7 Vishvananda Ishaya :
> 1) Weekly meeting for team leads. This is a time for us to discuss blueprint
> progress, multiple-team-related issues, etc. Going to shoot for Mondays at
> 2100 for this one. I really need the subteam leads to commit to making this
> meeting. We can discuss at the
excellent ideas. I especially like the standardized list of headers.
just to be sure, mondays at 2100utc? if so, no conflicts on my end
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 4:51 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
>
> > 2) *Closing down the team mailinglists.* Some of the lists have been a
Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
> 2) *Closing down the team mailinglists.* Some of the lists have been a
> bit active, but I think the approach that soren has been using of
> sending messages to the regular list with a team [header] is a better
> approach. Examples:
> [db] Should we use zookeeper?
> [s
On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 19:54 -0800, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> The Nova subteams have now been active for a month and a half. Some
> things are going very well, and others could use a little improvement.
> To keep things moving forward, I'd like to make the following changes:
Hello Everyone,
The Nova subteams have now been active for a month and a half. Some things are
going very well, and others could use a little improvement. To keep things
moving forward, I'd like to make the following changes:
1) Weekly meeting for team leads. This is a time for us to discuss
19 matches
Mail list logo
