Excellent, good to know,thank you Diego :)
Razique Mahroua - Nuage & Corazique.mahr...@gmail.comTel : +33 9 72 37 94 15
Le 19 févr. 2013 à 22:22, Diego Parrilla Santamaría a écrit :We have used Gluster for small deployments, but lately we have changed our mind
So it sounds like what we're talking about here is running a Ceph or
GlusterFS node alongside the compute node (ie, on the same physical
system). I assume then that VMs access their volumes via NFS or iSCSI from
Cinder on the controller node, and in turn, Cinder reads and writes to the
cluster FS,
We have used Gluster for small deployments, but lately we have changed our
mind. Basically we have bet on Gluster for 2013 because of:
- 10GbE everywhere, and Gluster MUST run in 10GbE (or Infiniband)
- 3.3 release fixes some issues when locking big files: Granular locking
- libgfapi reborn, no m
Hey Marco, have you been able to run some performance test on your Gluster cluster?Thanks :)
Razique Mahroua - Nuage & Corazique.mahr...@gmail.comTel : +33 9 72 37 94 15
Le 18 févr. 2013 à 14:20, Marco CONSONNI a écrit :Hello Sam,I've tried two of them: NFS and Gluster.Some pr
Hello Sam,
I've tried two of them: NFS and Gluster.
Some problems with the former (migration didn't work properly), no problem
with the latter.
I vote for Gluster.
Hope it helps,
Marco.
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Samuel Winchenbach wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Can anyone give me a recommendati
I haven't played that much with Glusterfs and pacemaker but I'm pretty sure
that there is already a resource agent for this. Maybe the Filesystem RA can do
it but you probably might have a look at the upstream version on the Cluster
Lab Github.
Cheers
On 15 févr. 2013, at 20:54, Samuel Winch
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 1:08 PM, JR wrote:
> Is there anyone using GPFS (General Parallel Filesystem) from IBM. It's
> high performing, posix compliant, can do internal replication, etc...?
>
> To make it work, would one simply have to modify the nova-volume (or
> cinder) code that creates a vol
Is there anyone using GPFS (General Parallel Filesystem) from IBM. It's
high performing, posix compliant, can do internal replication, etc...?
To make it work, would one simply have to modify the nova-volume (or
cinder) code that creates a volume-group using the corresponding GPFS
commands? Or,
Thanks,
I think I will go with GlusterFS. MooseFS looks interesting, but
maintaining a package outside the repo/cloud archive is not something I
want to deal with.
Along the same lines... is it possible to mount a GlusterFS volume in
pacemaker? I have tried both ocf:heartbeat:Filesystem and
Hi,
Important: Mount the CephFS filesystem on the client machine, not the
> cluster machine.
It's just like NFS, if you mount an NFS export on the NFS server, you get
kernel locks.
Unfortunately even if love Ceph far more than the other, I won't go with
CephFS, at least not know. But if are in
Another one:
- MooseFS (
http://docs.openstack.org/trunk/openstack-compute/admin/content/installing-moosefs-as-backend.html
)
- GlusterFS
- Ceph
- Lustre
Regards,
JuanFra
2013/2/15 Samuel Winchenbach
> Hi All,
>
> Can anyone give me a recommendation for a good shared-storage cluster
> fil
Hi All,
Can anyone give me a recommendation for a good shared-storage cluster
filesystem? I am running kvm-libvirt and would like to enable live
migration.
I have a number of hosts (up to 16) each with 2xTB drives. These hosts are
also my compute/network/controller nodes.
The three I am consi
12 matches
Mail list logo