@Zhiteng(I presume you are a thinese, right? ;) ), Thank you very much. I
catch your meaning.
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Huang Zhiteng winsto...@gmail.com wrote:
I think the short answer is it depends. It really depends on what
kind of user needs you want to use storage system to
Hi Lei:
I think Openstack manual shows a clear explanation for the differents kinds
of storage.
Check out this link (
http://docs.openstack.org/essex/openstack-compute/install/apt/content/terminology-storage.html
)
Hope it clarifies you.
Regards,
JuanFra
2012/11/29 Lei Zhang
Ceph has a bright future as OpenStack Storage backend. Although Ceph's guys
do not recommend to use CephFS for production environments, Ceph RBD seems
a reliable alternative to S3 in Glance and LVM in Cinder.
Links about this option (Ceph+Openstack):
- Great Sebastian's post:
Yes, Ceph is good choice. Openstack Team is very intresting about it. And
DreamHost is also trying the Ceph.
Just now, I think only Swift, Ceph, Sheepdog is the first choice in the
list I made above. (I know some companys are using sheeldog as the storage
in product env).
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at
Anybody can help?Could you give me some key term or links that I can
find some article/book about this. I am very confused about the storage in
the Openstack.
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Lei Zhang zhang.lei@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all ,
Here is my understanding about the stroage in the
I think the short answer is it depends. It really depends on what
kind of user needs you want to use storage system to fulfill. There's
no best solution but in each specific case, there can be one most
suitable solution for the requirement. I know this may not be the
answer you are seeking but
Hi all ,
Here is my understanding about the stroage in the openstack, I am very
happy about that who can figure out the wrong meaning or add your comment
for this.
Right now, there are two main kinds of storage needed by Openstack. One is
for Image, the other one is for Volume. These two support
7 matches
Mail list logo
