] on behalf
of Christian Wittwer [wittwe...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 5:38 AM
To: Lorin Hochstein
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Which nova scheduler for different hardware sizes?
Lorin,
Thanks for your reply. Well the least cost scheduler
Lorin,
Thanks for your reply. Well the least cost scheduler with these cost
functions looks interesting.
Unfortunately there is not much documenation about it. Can somebody
give me an example how to switch to that scheduler using the memory
cost function which already exist?
Cheers,
Christian
+sandy.walsh=rackspace@lists.launchpad.net] on behalf of
Christian Wittwer [wittwe...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 5:38 AM
To: Lorin Hochstein
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Which nova scheduler for different hardware sizes?
Lorin,
Thanks for your
+sandy.walsh=rackspace@lists.launchpad.net] on behalf
of Christian Wittwer [wittwe...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 5:38 AM
To: Lorin Hochstein
Cc: openstack@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Openstack] Which nova scheduler for different hardware sizes?
Lorin,
Thanks
Christian:
You could use the least cost scheduler, but I think you'd have to write your
own cost function to take into account the different number of cores. Looking
at the source, the only cost function it comes with only takes into account the
amount of memory that's free, not loading in
5 matches
Mail list logo